[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] tracking macro expansion
|
I'm doing this:
public static boolean isMacroExpansion(IASTNode node)
{
IASTNodeLocation[] nl = node.getNodeLocations();
return nl.length == 1 && nl[0] instanceof IASTMacroExpansionLocation;
}
But I'm not an expert on CDT internals. So this might be wrong or there
might be a better approach.
Hope that helps
Marco
On 15.03.2013 13:17, Simon Taddiken wrote:
Hi all,
for my bachelor thesis I'm planning on writing a refactoring plugin for
the CDT platform. I'm therefore also interested in tracking macro
expansion in order to report proper warnings to the user when trying to
apply a refactoring. As by now my needs would probably be satisfied if I
could be able to determine whether any node in the AST exists because of
macro expansion (no matter from which macro).
As I want my plugin to comply with the official CDT release, changing
internal API like Marco did is no option for me. I'd be glad if anyone
has a suggestion on how to properly do this.
Thanks
Simon
On 05.03.2013 13:01, Marco Trudel wrote:
Dear all
I implemented some macro analysis using MacroExpander [1] and
MacroExpansionTracker [2]. Are those classes intended to be used
outside of the CDT internals? To use them, I had to make some
modifications to CDT:
- I made the class PreprocessorMacro public (the MacroExpander
constructor takes a CharArrayMap<PreprocessorMacro>).
- I made MacroExpansionTracker.finish() protected so I can redefine it
in my subclass (also start() and fail() probably should be protected).
- I made the class TokenList public (it's used as argument to
MacroExpansionTracker methods).
If MacroExpander is not intended to be used outside of the CDT
internals, is there a recommended way for Macro analysis?
Where possible in the AST, I want to identify nodes that were
arguments to function style macros. E.g. having an AST like:
1 + 2 * 3 * 4 + 5
coming from the C code:
1 + MUL(2 * 3, 4) + 5 // with the macro: #define MUL(A, B) A * B
I want to recognize that "2 * 3" comes from the macro argument A and
that "4" comes from the macro argument B. This indeed works now but
maybe there's a better way than what I did.
Thanks
Marco
[1] org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.parser.scanner.MacroExpander
[2] org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.parser.scanner.MacroExpansionTracker
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev