My 2 cents: giving people misinformation is more damaging than giving them no information.
If a CDT user sees no Juno docs and he resorts to Indigo docs, the docs possibly being out of date is implicit. Users who find docs in Juno probably would not assume they’re outdated.
If the delta is missing information on new features/API, OK…that’s mostly harmless. If the delta is
changes in existing features/API, that’s bad. There’s nothing more frustrating than taking the time to read and understand something only to find out it’s no longer applicable or correct.
John
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Marc-Andre Laperle
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 11:46 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT docs missing in Eclipse Juno Infocenter
I think it should be uploaded. There are more complaints about the doc not being there than complaints about it being outdated. I update them when I change something but at some point we'll have to go back and add the missing stuff.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=390140
Marc-Andre
On 07/11/2012 7:43 AM, Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
Well,
As I just notice the message from 20-Oct-2012 here on the list,
I’m not going to contribute CDT docs to Juno when the CDT committer team
isn’t convinced uploading those docs is a good thing.
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Architect – Development Tools,
Wind River
direct +43.662.457915.85 fax +43.662.457915.6
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
|