Re: [cdt-dev] Speaking of API compatibility

[Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'm not sure if there are any issues with that. Assuming we are API
compliant, you weren't allowed to add new Java 6 types to the
interfaces. And Java 6 is backwards compatibile with Java 5. In fact
almost everyone had been using Java 6 already anyway.

Doug.

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Since we're on the topic of being backwards-compatible.
>
> I don't have much experience on how vendors extend the CDT,
> so it is not clear to me if our move from Java 5 to Java 6 is
> backwards-compatible for them?
>
> Thanks
>
> Marc
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev