[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Autotools contribution
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Andrew Overholt
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 9:10 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Autotools contribution
>
> > While you are at it, will gcov and gprof be moved too?
>
> There are currently no plans to do so. If we want to talk about a full-scale
> annexing of Linux Tools by CDT then those make sense :)
So far I've really only been thinking about build systems, especially if we have a round of cleaning up the CDT build infrastructure.
I think it is clear though, that a lot of the things going on in Linux Tools is of interest to the general CDT community. Moving things around won't always make sense, unless there is a lot of demand from the non-Linux CDT crowd for these tools. Autotools was obvious because of the MinGW/MSYS support for it.
:D
