Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] LRParser test failures
I vote +1 on that. After LRParser tests fixed, there are only intermittently failing test left and it would be worth it to fix them for good too. And I think it would be much better having the list of failing tests directly in the email if possible.

Andrew

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:48 AM, James Blackburn <jamesblackburn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On 24 January 2011 15:40, Chris Recoskie <recoskie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This is compounded by the fact that hudson only emails build results to people who recently made checkins. Since the changes that started the failures were made elsewhere, none of us got an email. So, it's not a matter of the parsers not getting any love... it's that we just didn't know there was a problem.


I know that the platform guys email nightly build results to their releng list and seem to make a big effort to track and fix failures.  We should probably do the same in CDT -- filtering them is a simple mail rule away...

Cheers,
James

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


Back to the top