[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF Disassembly"
|
Marc,
I've started to pick this up from Warren. I created
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=303968
for moving the MoveToLine, ResumeAtLine, and RunToLine stuff to DSF. I've
moved most everything around but have a few more things to do before it's
working.
- Ken
> From: ext Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:33:13 +0100
> To: "'CDT General developers list.'" <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF Disassembly"
>
>>> As for the IMoveToLine (etc) implementations, they seem to explicitly use an
>>> MI run control DSF service.
>>> The base service (IRunControl) just doesn't provide the needed
>>> functionality. I think a valid question
>>> is: why isn't the base service being extended to handle these basic debugger
>>> operations? Moving the PC,
>>> e.g., is certainly not a GDB-ism. I think every C/C++ debugger in the world
>>> supports it, so shouldn't
>>> it be part of the DSF definition?
>>
>> I agree. It would be best to move the underlying service extensions to the
>> DSF itself.
>
> Cool.
> But we'll have to create an IRunControl2 interface to contain the new
> runToLocation() and resumeAtLocation()
>
> Warren, can you open a bug to state exactly what you need?
>
> Thanks
