Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 6.0.2 RC4

Hi,
 
Thanks for the rebuild.  Wihle trying it I noticed that bug 299300 (DSF number format) was not part of it.  Makes sense since I didn't commit it yet.
But I think it is something that improves the fix for bug 275238 (pretty-print) , which was requested by the community.
 
So, what I'm saying is: if it's not big deal to do a build again (I should commit within 10 minutes), that would be nice,
but I don't think it is essential.
 
Sorry for the hastle
 
Marc
 


From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vivian Kong
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 4:15 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 6.0.2 RC4

Here's the new RC4 build:
http://download.eclipse.org/tools/cdt/builds/6.0.2/I.I201002161416/index.html

Regards,

Vivian Kong
IBM Eclipse CDT
IBM Canada Toronto Lab

Inactive hide details for Marc Khouzam ---02/16/2010 01:48:26 PM---Thanks for noticing Toni! There was actually a request from Marc Khouzam ---02/16/2010 01:48:26 PM---Thanks for noticing Toni! There was actually a request from the community to have bug 275238 as part


From:

Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

To:

"'CDT General developers list.'" <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

02/16/2010 01:48 PM

Subject:

RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 6.0.2 RC4

Sent by:

cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx




Thanks for noticing Toni!
There was actually a request from the community to have bug 275238 as part of 3.5.2, so it would be nice to
have it as part of our build. (bug 249169 is using the same fix as 275238)

Sorry for fixing it last minute like that.


From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Leherbauer, Anton (Toni)
Sent:
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 1:39 PM
To:
CDT General developers list.
Subject:
RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 6.0.2 RC4

Hi Vivian,

I noticed that two commits did not make it into the RC4 candidate,
one from Marc for bugs 275238 and 249169 and one from me (bug 280010).
I believe RC4 is the last release candidate before GA. In this case, I think we would need a rebuild.

Thanks,
Toni


From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vivian Kong
Sent:
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:42 PM
To:
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
[cdt-dev] CDT 6.0.2 RC4

Hi everyone,

Galileo SR2 RC4+1 is today. Did anyone get a chance to try out our RC4 Candidate build?

http://download.eclipse.org/tools/cdt/builds/6.0.2/I.I201002120608/index.html

Regards,

Vivian Kong
IBM Eclipse CDT
IBM Canada Toronto Lab
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


Back to the top