[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Is it ok to break the build of CDT on 3.5?
|
I'm not sure I understood what you
meant.
I want to break CDT 6.1 on Platform 3.5
Meaning that anyone working on CDT 6.1 will need to run
platform 3.6
Or is that what you meant too? :-)
This usually happens every release. Usually we just ask for vetos
in case someone is using the old CDT with the new Platform. But even those
vetos should be only short term
So any vetos on breaking CDT 6.0 on
Platform 3.6? (none from me BWT).
Doug.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Marc Khouzam
<marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi,
with
3.6M2 platform gives us a way to have asynchronous commands.
See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=284363
Using
this means that if a command is taking a long time, the UI won't
hang.
As part of bug 275687 (Reverse commands block the UI
thread)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=275687
I've
migrated the Reverse Debugging commands (reverse steps, reverse resume,
etc)
to this new infrastructure. Also, I moved these commands from
DSF-GDB down to
cdt.debug.ui to allow for other integrations to use
them.
The problem is that if I check-in that patch, some plugins will
no longer build
with 3.5, you would need 3.6M2.
I wondered what is
our approach to this?
This patch is in no way urgent, but I'd like to
eventually commit it.
Any
guidance?
Thanks
Marc
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev
mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev