Re: [cdt-dev] Communication between Eclipse UI and gdb

[Rohit Girme <rgirme@xxxxxxx>]

Hi John,

The issue with CDI, I thought is there is not enough documentation on it. I couldnt really understand what goes where.

Rohit

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Rohit Girme <rgirme@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

DSF is difficult you say...ok..anyways i will give it a try and get back to you in case i run into something..

Thanks anyways..
Rohit

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:39 PM, John Cortell <john.cortell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hm. If you find CDI complex, you will likely have a very difficult time with DSF. It is more robust and extensible, but the technology is far more complicated--heavily using Java generics and asynchronous design patterns. The problem with CDI is that it is in maintenance mode; DSF is the future. You can take the easy (easier) route and integrate at the CDI level, but your product won't benefit from new features/capabilities.

John

At 03:32 PM 9/4/2009, Rohit Girme wrote:

Hey John,

I have been trying to integrate a debugger using CDI , but it appears to be very complex.
Do you have any idea which one is better or less complex relatively to use CDI or DSF?

Thanks,
Rohit

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev