[cdt-dev] Should "inferior" be translated?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[cdt-dev] Should "inferior" be translated?

From: Vivian Kong <vivkong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:59:34 -0400
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Got the following question from translators. I'd appreciate it if someone can help answer it. Thanks!

In the file: org.eclipse.cdt.debug.mi.core\org\eclipse\cdt\debug\mi\core\cdi\CdiResources.properties

cdi.model.Target.Inferior_already_running=Inferior is already running

Should the word "Inferior" be translated?

Regards,

Vivian Kong
IBM Eclipse CDT
IBM Canada Toronto Lab

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] Should "inferior" be translated?
  - From: Doug Schaefer

Prev by Date: [cdt-dev] Re: Get list of functions?
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Should "inferior" be translated?
Previous by thread: [cdt-dev] Get list of functions?
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Should "inferior" be translated?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs