Hi guys,
Looking at IType in CVS it seems to have gained an
@noextend and an @noimplement and the only implementations appear to be
internal, so shouldn’t be used. Indeed looking at other code a lot of
the public interfaces appear to have gained @noextend (e.g. ICBasicType,
ICPPBasicType, IASTNode, IASTTranslationUnit, ICASTCompositeTypeSpecifier
etc). Is the intention that there should be only the default CDT
implementation of these?
We’re currently implementing our own AbstractLanguage and
have been carefully avoiding using internal code which means having to
implement our own versions of all of these interfaces. Is creating a new
language not supported in CDT 6.0? Is there some other way that this should be
done?
Cheers,
Richard
The
information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it
is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you
are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or
other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender
immediately and then delete this email.
Any
representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to
contract.
This
message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content. However, it is
essential that the recipient also checks this message using commercially
available mail scanning and anti-virus software. IPL Information Processing
Limited accepts no liability for any loss or damage resulting from any virus
or other dangerous content in this message.
IPL
Information Processing Limited is registered in England and Wales under
company registration number 1418818. Registration took place at Cardiff on 10
May 1979. IPL Information Processing Limited's registered office and normal
place of business is Eveleigh House, Grove Street, Bath, BA1 5LR, United
Kingdom. IPL is also registered for Value Added Tax (VAT) under registration
number GB 601 2931 83.