RE: [cdt-dev] Cross tools namespace proposal

["Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Liviu. This looks pretty good. The naming seems fine.

I was wondering what you were putting into each of the plug-ins. I am
working on my tutorial for EclipseCon on adding cross compiler support
to the CDT, and I was wondering what approach you were taking.

Thanks,
Doug. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liviu Ionescu
> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 6:03 AM
> To: 'CDT General developers list.'
> Subject: [cdt-dev] Cross tools namespace proposal
> 
> I am currently working on an update for the GNUARM plugin (a 
> SourceForge project currently under 
> org.eclipse.cdt.gnuarm.*), and I'm thinking of using a more 
> unified namespace.
> 
> My proposal for cross compiling toolchains is to use as base
> 
> 	org.eclipse.cdt.cross.*
> 
> further continue with processor
> 
> 	org.eclipse.cdt.cross.arm.*
> 	org.eclipse.cdt.cross.avr.*
> 
> compiler family
> 
> 	org.eclipse.cdt.cross.arm.gnu.*	
> 	org.eclipse.cdt.cross.arm.iar.*
> 
> optionally variant, like CodeSourcery, if they differ from 
> the main distributions
> 
> 	org.eclipse.cdt.cross.arm.gnu.cs.*
> 
> platform
> 
> 	org.eclipse.cdt.cross.arm.gnu.win32.*
> 	org.eclipse.cdt.cross.arm.gnu.linux.*
> 	org.eclipse.cdt.cross.arm.gnu.macosx.*
> 
> 	org.eclipse.cdt.cross.arm.gnu.cs.win32.*
> 	org.eclipse.cdt.cross.arm.gnu.cs.linux.*
> 	org.eclipse.cdt.cross.arm.gnu.cs.macosx.*
> 
> 
> The GNUARM plugin base class would be 
> "org.eclipse.cdt.cross.arm.gnu.*", with internal IDs using 
> the above namespace.
> 
> Any comments? 
> 
> 
> Liviu Ionescu
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>