[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Change to the indexer
|
Thanks Markus! I'll take a look.
Regards,
Vivian Kong
IBM Eclipse CDT
IBM Canada Toronto Lab
|------------>
| From: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"Schorn, Markus" <Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|<cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|12/07/2007 06:12 AM |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|[cdt-dev] Change to the indexer |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Hi,
I just commited my work on handling headers included both from c- and
c++-files. The fix reduces the problem percentage for firefox from 5.06%
to 3.13% :-).
The change has no impact on the indexing performance.
However, I had to change the indexing logics. Because part of it was
implemented in four different classes (pdom fast/full and standalone
fast/full indexer tasks) I restructured this to have the logics in one
singe class (AbstractIndexerTask). The code turns out to be less complex
than it
was before.
Vivian, Chris: I think I did not introduce an additional dependency for
the stand-alone indexer, please verify and complain, if I did. Because
now the stand-alone indexer differs only slightly from the project
indexer I am confident that it is working fine, but I don't have
testcases to veryfy that. If I broke something, please tell me. The
stand-alone indexer specific code is found in
StandaloneIndexerInputAdapter.
Markus.
The related bugzilla:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=191989
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
