[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] Major PDOM changes in HEAD
|
The community has spoken and I have responded. :).
The PDOM is back to per project.
Thank you all for your input. You have definitely helped me pick the better
path.
Cheers,
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC member
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Lothar Werzinger
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 2:21 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Major PDOM changes in HEAD
On Friday 19 May 2006 09:31, Matthias Spycher wrote:
> Doesn't that problem also exist in a single project with multiple build
> configurations?
I guess that if you change the build configuration a reparse is necessary.
That could be mitigated by having two projects of the same source each with
a
different active build configuration.
> Lothar Werzinger wrote:
> > I think a per workspace solution is doomed sooner or later. What for
> > example happens if you have two projects in the same workspace that
> > contain the same files, but need to be built with different set of
macros
> > (like local cross builds)?
Lothar
--
Lothar Werzinger Dipl.-Ing. Univ.
framework & platform architect
Tradescape Inc.
111 West St. John Street, Suite 200
San Jose, Ca 95113
email: lothar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
web: http://www.tradescape.biz
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
