[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Closure process for CDT M7
|
Yes we agreed to change the date by two weeks.
This would change the dates as follows:
CDT 3.0 M7 - Monday, june 13, 2005 -
Note these dates are conditional on Eclipse 3.1 schedule
CDT 3.0 RC1 Monday, June 27,2005 - Release Candidate
CDT 3.0 RC2 Monday, July 11, 2005 - Release Candidate Eclipse 3.1 GA
expected ~July 1
CDT 3.0 RC3 Wednesday July. 27, 2005 - Final Release Candidate
TO be fair this should be voted on.
Derrick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Treggiari, Leo
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 2:40 PM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Closure process for CDT M7
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> > Note that the current plan on the web has M7 scheduled for May 30.
>
> Yes, but I thought that we agreed at April's meeting to slip that
> date (and all following dates) by two weeks. Actually, it may not
> have been *exactly* two weeks, it was defined to be the Eclipse M7
> date + n (which "n" I didn't record but was about a 2 week slip).
>
> > As a starting list, I propose:
> > 1. Clean up the defects in bugzilla on 3.0:
> > a. No open enhancement requests
> > b. No defects assigned to an inbox owner
> > c. All other defects triaged so that the only open
> > defects are ones that we intend to fix before GA.
> > (this way anybody who has a defect moved off of 3.0
> > can speak up while there is still time to affect
> > the contents of 3.0)
>
> I don't know what an "open" bugzilla is. I'm guessing that you may mean:
> Status == (NEW | ASSIGNED | REOPENED) && Target == (3.0* || undefined)
>
> Thanks,
> Leo
>
> ________________________________________
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of David Daoust
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 9:23 AM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cdt-dev] Closure process for CDT M7
>
>
>
> I would like to start some discussion around some guidelines to define the
> exit criteria for M7. (i.e. all these conditions must be met before we
> declare M7). I want to make sure that we agree now, so that there are
> no "bumps in the road" as we approach GA. Note that the current plan
> on the web has M7 scheduled for May 30.
>
> As a starting list, I propose:
> 1. Clean up the defects in bugzilla on 3.0:
> a. No open enhancement requests
> b. No defects assigned to an inbox owner
> c. All other defects triaged so that the only open defects
> are ones that we intend to fix before GA. (this way anybody who has a
> defect moved off of 3.0 can speak up while there is still time to affect
> the contents of 3.0)
>
> 2. All the Features in the plan are complete (there may be defects
> open but the functionality is complete and useable.)
>
> 3. There has been a sanity run on the M7 build (using Eclipse M7) -
> - we need to define what the extent of this testing is..
>
> 4. We have a preliminary "What's new" list for 3.0. This list
> should cover the entire development of 3.0 so that the community can help
> with the testing/validation.
>
> Please let me know if you think that the items are good, bad, or just
> ugly. Also if you have additional items, I would like to add them to my
> list.
>
>
> - Dave
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev