RE: [cdt-dev] Indexer inconsistent behaviour

[John Camelon <jcamelon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Syntax error, for the time being.  

JohnC
www.eclipse.org/cdt

cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 12/03/2004 10:55:01
AM:

> So currently does that mean that K&R style code gets ignored or
> marked as a syntax error ?
>  
> Tracy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of John Camelon
> Sent: 03 December 2004 15:03
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Indexer inconsistent behaviour

> 
> We haven't had support for K&R style declarations in a CDT release.
  
> Ref: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=45331 
> 
> I am hoping to get this in for CDT 3.0.   
> JohnC
> www.eclipse.org/cdt 
> 
> cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 12/03/2004 08:52:55 AM:
> 
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > I'm seeing some inconsistent behaviour in the C-editor while
parsing C
> > code and displaying red markers/squiggly lines. Thought I'd post
here
> > before submitting a bugzilla because I don't actually know what
the
> > expected behaviour is, and also to see if the underlying problem
was
> > already known and bug reported. 
> > 
> > This occurs with CDT 2.1 RC4.
> > 
> > Here's the case:
> > 
> > Create a new C project (doesn't seem to matter whether managed
or std )
> > If I create a new Source file and add the following to it:
> > 
> > struct m
> > {
> >  int n;
> > };
> > 
> > int z (b) 
> > struct t b;
> > {
> >   return b.y;
> > }
> > 
> > I get red error markers and red squiggles under 
> > int z(b) 
> > struct t b;
> > {
> > 
> > If I hold the mouse over this code I get it says it's a syntax
error. 
> > 
> > However, if I remove the struct m code (and sometimes I need
to close
> > and reopen project to ensure it indexes it) then the int z code
does not
> > have any errors marked on it. 
> > 
> > This is just a small test case, but I get similar sort of problems
with
> > other bits of K&R style code. I'm not sure whether this kind
of code is
> > normally marked out or just ignored ? Is this a bug & if
it is, is there
> > already a bugzilla report for it ?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Tracy Miranda
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev