Re: [cdt-dev] New generated makefile pattern

[Alex Chapiro <achapiro@xxxxxxx>]

StarTeam is another example (one of our major customers uses it). We 
just set  read-only flag off at the moment of touching, then restore it. 
Not necessary to do it with CVS.

Douglas Schaefer wrote:

> Ouch. How would that work in a scenario where you do not have write 
> permission to the files that have to be built, e.g., in a ClearCase 
> dynamic view?
>
> Doug Schaefer, IBM's Eclipse CDT Architect
> Ottawa (Palladium), Ontario, Canada
>
>
>
> Alex Chapiro <achapiro@xxxxxxx> 
> Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 05/19/2004 04:28 PM
> Please respond to
> cdt-dev
>
>
> To
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: [cdt-dev] New generated makefile pattern
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sean Evoy wrote:
>
>  
>
> > Chris, 
> > There are two basic extension I am thinking about; a makefile generator
> > that you can supply in the toolchain, and dependency calculators that
> > you can supply with a tool. They have to interact to get the deps
> >    
> right.
>  
>
> >    
> Optionally they can avoid interaction, as in our implementation of 
> dependency checker which just touches files that has to be rebuild and 
> relies on the standard make dependency checking rules.
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>