Re: [cdt-dev] Suggested change to String option command generation.

[Chris Wiebe <cwiebe@xxxxxxx>]

> As a related topic, something we at TI were thinking of doing sometime
> down the road was extending the "catch all" box so that it would show
> the full command line string that would be passed to the tool (i.e. it
> would pick up the output of all the other options based on their states)
> so that the user a) could actually see everything that would be passed
> to the tool and in what order, and b) so in theory the user could edit
> whatever they wanted in that box and theoretically have it parsed back
> and reflected in the other options in the GUI (e.g. if you turned on the
> symbolic debug checkbox, and then in the "full command to tool" box you
> removed the -g flag, then the symbolic debug checkbox would get
> unchecked).

This is a great idea, especially the round-trip editing which is very 
nice to have.  I believe MS Visual Studio does this as well...

Cheers,
Chris