Re: [cdt-dev] Natively Compiled Eclipse Snapshot Available

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] Natively Compiled Eclipse Snapshot Available

From: Anthony Green <green@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 14 Aug 2003 08:44:11 -0700
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/cdt-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.

On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 10:23, John Camelon wrote:
>  I'm curious 
> if there are particular constructs that you could perhaps advise us to 
> stay away from in an effort to maintain gcj compliance?

I'm concerned about bits of Eclipse being coded in AspectJ, since
AFAICT, this precludes AOT compilation.  I'd be happy if I was wrong
here.  Anybody?

AG

-- 
Anthony Green <green@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat, Inc.

References:
- Re: [cdt-dev] Natively Compiled Eclipse Snapshot Available
  - From: John Camelon

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] GDBServer vs Stub?
Next by Date: [cdt-dev] More setting up questions..
Previous by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Natively Compiled Eclipse Snapshot Available
Next by thread: [cdt-dev] CDT monthly meeting tomorrow
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs