RE: [cdt-dev] JavaCC and the JJ file.

["Camelon, John" <jcamelon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

What I would like to shoot for is that we merge the NewParser1 branch into
HEAD sometime next month so that we can ensure that we are concentrating our
efforts on the solution going forward.  A preference could be provided to
allow the user/developer to choose their parsing framework for the outline
view in order to minimize the risk regarding 1.0.2 quality.   

Not that I'm officially committing just yet (as I'm still pounding through
the ANSI C++ grammar as I write this) ... I'm just wondering if anyone has
an opinion about this strategy. 

JohnC


-----Original Message-----
From: Schaefer, Doug [mailto:dschaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:35 AM
To: 'cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] JavaCC and the JJ file.


Thanks, Alain,

We'll also take a look at when we can get enough of the new parser working
to generate ICElements as well.  If this is soon, it might be the better way
to go.

Doug Schaefer
Senior Staff Software Engineer
Rational - the software development company
Ottawa (Kanata), Ontario, Canada


-----Original Message-----
From: Alain Magloire [mailto:alain@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: February 25, 2003 8:03 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] JavaCC and the JJ file.

> 
> There are quite a few things that the current parser doesn't pick up.  
> The one that is bugging me lately is the WINAPI and friends macros 
> that blow
up
> the function they are modifying.  We need to get something in for the
April
> delivery (can I call this 1.0.2?) to bring the quality level of the
outline
> view a bit higher that what we've got.
> 
> Alain, since we're not scheduled to release the new parser until after 
> April, would you be interested in committing the work you have done 
> with
the
> old IBM parser?  Or fire a patch at me so that I could polish it off 
> and
get
> it in?  Then, we should also be able to add in the K&R param decls as 
> well (hopefully easy...).

I will take a look at it again, seems so long. To get it going, I wrote a
basic C Preprocessor(although evaluation of expression was still missing)
and moved things around to generate the ICElement. Let me see, if I can dig
this out again.


_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev