RE: [cdt-dev] Sam's Build Model is in

["Schaefer, Doug" <dschaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"build" because it matches "model" and "index" and I want to make sure that
it is clear that this is much more than just a Builder class.  It is a
"Build System" ;-)

Doug Schaefer
Senior Staff Software Engineer
Rational - the software development company
Ottawa (Kanata), Ontario, Canada
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Alain Magloire [mailto:alain@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 11:48 AM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Sam's Build Model is in

> 
> Hey all,
> 
>  
> 
> >From the patch notices, you'll see that I have merged Sam's source for
his
> build model work into the cdt.core and cdt.ui plug-ins.  Please let me
know
> ASAP if you see any regression in functionality from the rest of the CDT.
> 

- Why "build" instead of the existing "builder"? not that it matters, just
curious.
- PDE will show errors if you have it turned on in the preference page.  The
  QNX builder was implementing some of it.  So we should probably comment
the
  references out in the plugin.xml.

Instead of having *Point classes ex: CToolPoint etc .. why not use the
current
provided scheme, the ICExtension.

A proposal will follow shortly, explaining the ICExtension. Since CDT can
be seen as a framework managing lot of specific extension points, this will
be
a proposal to manage/share those extension points.

Thanks, for putting this in.

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev