Re: [aspectj-users] Advice on Constructors With Subclasses

["Andrew Eisenberg" <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Actually, it is the "call", not the "returning" that made it work.
Should probably work with or without the "returning" clause.

In AspectJ, super calls are not considered "calls" and so are not
matched by the call designator, but the method bodies are executed,
hence they *are* matched by the execution designator.

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:25 PM, James Elliott <jvelliott@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks a lot. Guess I never tried the "returning" keyword.
>
> Much appreciated.
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>