Re: [aspectj-users] Good Techniques of Tracing

["Eric Bodden" <eric.bodden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Oh, right. That is indeed really subtle. AspectJ assumes a fully
qualified type if you do not use any wildcards. That's really subtle.
(Add negation using "!" and you get completely lost ;-).) You can
match any package using *.. as in:

call(* *..ArquivoTcs.*(..))

Eric

On 12/07/07, ramilani12 <ramilani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Guys
> I fixed my problem , this skill:
>
> pointcut traceMethods():  execution(* escala.engine.ArquivoTcs.*(..) ) ||
> call(* escala.engine.ArquivoTcs.*(..))
>     && !within(TraceAspect);
>
> before(): traceMethods()
>     {
>         if ( log.isEnabledFor(Level.INFO) )
>         {
>             Signature sig =
> thisJoinPointStaticPart.getSignature();
>             log.log(Level.INFO , "Entering [
> "+sig.getDeclaringType().getName()+" .
> "+sig.getName()+"]");
>         }
>     }
>
> I need specify which package and sub package which the Class it belongs
> Why that? , what´s difference between specify package and sub package and
> don´t specify package and sub package?
>  I don´t understand?!
> I use Eclipse 3.3 and last version AspectJ
>
>
> Nice twist Eric about pointcut doctor , but bad only run on Eclipse 3.2 and
> AJDT 1.4
>
>
>
> On 7/12/07, Eric Bodden <eric.bodden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I agree that it looks like a totally useful feature. I think as soon
> > as this will get into AJDT, the traffic on this mailing list may
> > decrease quite a bit. ;-)
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > On 12/07/07, Andy Clement < andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > they have some small changes to the weaver that are open as bug
> > > reports for us to address.
> > >
> > > On 12/07/07, Barry Kaplan < groups1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Sigh. I just saw that they /replace/ the aspectj-weaver, which will
> > > > almost certainly mean using an old version. And also only ajdt 1.4 is
> > > > supported. This is really too bad. Are there any plans to add this
> > > > capability into the main aspectj product?
> > > >
> > > > -barry
> > > >
> > > > Barry Kaplan wrote:
> > > > > Eric Bodden wrote:
> > > > >> I can't see anything wrong with it. Is your setup correct? You
> might
> > > > >> want to try the pointcut doctor:
> http://pointcutdoctor.cs.ubc.ca/
> > > > >
> > > > > Wow! pointcutdoctor is amazing. This plugin needs some marketing. I
> > > > > have never gotten a hint of it before now.
> > > > >
> > > > > -barry
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Eric Bodden
> > Sable Research Group
> > McGill University, Montréal, Canada
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> >
>
>
>
> --
> raphael milani
> :=]
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users


--
Eric Bodden
Sable Research Group
McGill University, Montréal, Canada