[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [aspectj-users] need suggestion on how to deal with anti-aspectj people :(
|
Marco,
Or binary weaving the aspects as an
additional step in your batch build process.
Matthew Webster
AOSD Project
Java Technology Centre, MP146
IBM United Kingdom Limited
Hursley Park, Winchester, SO21 2JN, England
Telephone: +44 196 2816139 (external) 246139 (internal)
Email: Matthew Webster/UK/IBM @ IBMGB, matthew_webster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://w3.hursley.ibm.com/~websterm/
Santiago Aguiar <santi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
29/01/2007 11:36
Please respond to
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|
To
| aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| Re: [aspectj-users] need suggestion
on how to deal with anti-aspectj people
:( |
|
You could also use load time weaving, if it's acceptable
for your application. That way, aspects are not compiled but loaded when
your application or test cases are running (which, as always, has some
pros an cons).
We currently use this approach at work (where there's also some internal
resistance to using aspects).
saludos!
Marco Mistroni wrote:
hi all,
i have developed a project using aspectj, because i had a business
rule that needed to be applied in various layers of
the application.
Only problem is that, every time in my RAD i change the code of a class
that is affected by an aspect, aspectj plugin for eclipse
recompile the whole project (aind since i have many dependencies, it ends
up recompiling all projects in my workspace)
many of my colleagues are pissed off for this, and they want to drop aspectj
because 'it takes hell lot of time to compile, surely if we write
a class with the business rule, and call it from every part in the code
where is needed, we can achieve the same effect without having the compilation
hell'
beside that with this idea we need to add one extra parameter for every
single method where we need to apply the business rule (should be a pain,
but withh eclipse quick-and-fix shortcuts that refactor all methods where
you need to add an extra parameter, everything is easy), i haven't
found any arguments to counterattack.....
anyone can give me some please?
i have said that with aspectj, you wouldn't need to change any signle line
of code to apply a business rule, because everything is coded into aspect...
but to them, this is not enough....
thanks and regards
marco
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
--
santiago aguiar
netlabs
Palmar 2548
Montevideo, Uruguay
Tel. +(598 2) 707 7687
Fax. +(598 2) 709 4866
http://www.netlabs.com.uy
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Attachment:
santi.vcf
Description: Binary data