[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [aspectj-users] JoinPoint SourceLocation vs. Stack Trace Interigation
|
The static part is known at compile-time - no reflective overhead.
http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Awww.eclipse.org+thisJoinPointStaticPart
"Using thisJoinPointStaticPart will avoid the run-time creation of the
join point object that may be necessary when using thisJoinPoint directly"
http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/progguide/language-thisJoinPoint.html
Wes
> ------------Original Message------------
> From: Gregory Kedge <greg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sat, Sep-2-2006 4:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] JoinPoint SourceLocation vs. Stack Trace Interigation
>
> I haven't. I will do diligence to figure out what advantage
> thisJoinPointStaticPart will bring to me, but if you(or anyone else)
> can share with me what you expect me to discover, please do...
>
> Kind Regards,
> Greg Kedge
>
>
>
> On Sep 2, 2006, at 4:51 PM, Eric Eide wrote:
>
> > "Gregory" == Gregory Kedge <greg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > Gregory> It is my understanding that the use of JoinPoint is a
> > Gregory> reflective operation. [...]
> >
> > Have you considered using `thisJoinPointStaticPart'?
> >
> > Eric.
> >
> > --
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------
> > Eric Eide <eeide@xxxxxxxxxxx> . University of Utah School
> > of Computing
> > http://www.cs.utah.edu/~eeide/ . +1 (801) 585-5512 voice, +1 (801)
> > 581-5843 FAX
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>