[aspectj-users] legal issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[aspectj-users] legal issues

From: Sejo.Cesic@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:15:03 +0100
Delivered-to: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/aspectj-users/>
List-help: <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

Does anyone know what are the consequences in case a (commercial) project decides to weave the classes from Suns JRE library or JSF implementation library or another product of that order?

Is it, from a legal point of view, allowed to do that? Do we need to read the license of each of them to find out?

Thanks in advance
Sejo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [aspectj-users] legal issues
  - From: Adrian Colyer

References:
- [aspectj-users] Match a method call on a class field with specific annotation
  - From: Rifflard Mickaël

Prev by Date: [aspectj-users] Match a method call on a class field with specific annotation
Next by Date: [aspectj-users] AspectJ5 Survey - please take part.
Previous by thread: [aspectj-users] Match a method call on a class field with specific annotation
Next by thread: Re: [aspectj-users] legal issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs