[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [aspectj-dev] Writing an AspectJ test that copies resources?
|
Ron,
Already implemented, tested and submitted.
The benefit of not having explicit copying is that the harness automatically
renames files according the specification e.g. "aop-mystuff.xml"
-> "META-INF/aop.xml". By and large simple the testcases used
in the harness don't need to be parameterized with additional files.
Matthew Webster
AOSD Project
Java Technology Centre, MP146
IBM Hursley Park, Winchester, SO21 2JN, England
Telephone: +44 196 2816139 (external) 246139 (internal)
Email: Matthew Webster/UK/IBM @ IBMGB, matthew_webster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://w3.hursley.ibm.com/~websterm/
Please respond to AspectJ
developer discussions <aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by:
aspectj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
To:
"'AspectJ developer
discussions'" <aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject:
RE: [aspectj-dev]
Writing an AspectJ test that copies resources?
Hi Matthew,
I agree: your proposed design
sounds right: the user’s Xlintfile should be able to just partially override
the defaults. And thanks for adding the logic to copy Xlint.properties
files. It seems like it would be useful to have a facility to copy non-compiled
files in general in the harness, rather than adding special cases like
aop.xml and Xlint.properties. Something like <copy file=”..”/>
(somewhat reminiscent of ant).
Do you want to submit an updated
patch for this logic or should I create one?
From: aspectj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:aspectj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matthew Webster
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:18 AM
To: AspectJ developer discussions
Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] Writing an AspectJ test that copies resources?
Ron,
There is no mechanism for resource copying and there is no test (that I
can find) for "-Xlintfile" in aop.xml. In fact there are no explicit
Xlint LTW tests. I will add the necessary logic to the harness to copy
an Xlint.properties file because I have already done it for aop.xml. However
I don't think the current implementation is correct nor do I think you
patch completely fixes it. I believe it should work like this:
1. Load XlintDefault.properties (otherwise all lint messages are WARNING)
2. Overlay LTW defaults i.e. ignore "adviceDidNotMatch" (see
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=117854)
3. Overlay user "-Xlintfile" (so they only have to specify the
messages they want to tailor)
4. Override with user "-Xlint" option
Matthew Webster
AOSD Project
Java Technology Centre, MP146
IBM Hursley Park, Winchester, SO21 2JN, England
Telephone: +44 196 2816139 (external) 246139 (internal)
Email: Matthew Webster/UK/IBM @ IBMGB, matthew_webster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://w3.hursley.ibm.com/~websterm/
Please respond to AspectJ
developer discussions <aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by:
aspectj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
To:
"'AspectJ developer discussions'"
<aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject: [aspectj-dev]
Writing an AspectJ test that copies resources?
I’m trying to write some regression tests for load-time weaving (for bug
#118715)
To test this, I need to copy a resource file (an Xlint.properties file)
over to the sandbox directory to be accessible from the classloader at
runtime. Is there any means already defined for copying resources over
to the sandbox?
Ron Bodkin
Chief Technology Officer
New Aspects of Software
w: (415) 824-4690
_______________________________________________
aspectj-dev mailing list
aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev_______________________________________________
aspectj-dev mailing list
aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev