work before 1.1 final -- was Re: [aspectj-dev] announcement for 1.1rc1

[Wes Isberg <wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Adrian Colyer wrote:
<snip> 
> how quickly do we think we can make it to 1.1f?

Another release candidate might be in order since 
the compiler was updated to sync with eclipse 2.1
(once some form of incremental compilation is restored).

In the bug database, some bugs have the default priority (P3)
but should be higher (e.g., Rich Price's VerifyError), so it's 
hard to tell what needs to be fixed before final.  (It is clear 
that rendering bugs to test cases is needed).  

Work not stated in bugs -- still on the table?
- support for incremental compilation in AJDE/Ajbrowser?
- more doc updates for actual 1.1 language/technology?
- tests for incremental mode and bytecode weaving?

Wes

Adrian Colyer wrote:
> 
> I think it probably is worth adding the retrospective news... if only to
> make clear that the project is still alive and well post transfer. But
> then... how quickly do we think we can make it to 1.1f?
> 
> -- Adrian.
> adrian_colyer@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 04 April 2003 18:11
> To: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> cc:
> From: hilsdale@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [aspectj-dev] announcement for 1.1rc1 on aspectj home page?
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I just edited the eclipse project home page to add info about a tutorial at
> PLDI, and I noticed that the RC1 item under "News" is commented out (well,
> it is also very optimistically dated 13 Dec 2002, so it was probably us
> parc guys who commented it out *smile*).  Any feeling as to whether we want
> a backdated "News" item of 14 March 2003 for the release of RC1, or should
> we just leave the "News" part of the front page alone until final?
> 
> -erik
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev