[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: Four files (Re: [aperi-dev] Mishap with source versus binary checkins...)
|
You know I am pretty confused by all
this.
Can we get together in a phone conference
today to discuss this?
My reading is that you have overwritten
Simona's changes for the NAS stuff, but it still doesn't compile.
Robert, are you available today?
Dave Wolfe/Portland/IBM
(dwolfe@xxxxxxxxxx)
TL: 775-3376 Office: 503-578-3376 Personal: 503-329-3960
UI Technical Lead, Aperi Open Source Storage Management
http://www.eclipse.org/aperi
"A good composer does not imitate; he
steals." - Igor Stravinsky
"Robert Wipfel"
<rawipfel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: aperi-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/15/2007 11:27 PM
Please respond to
Aperi Development <aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| "Aperi Development" <aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| Four files (Re: [aperi-dev] Mishap with
source versus binary checkins...) |
|
>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:03 AM, in
message <473CDE67.C5C7.00CF.0@xxxxxxxxxx>,
"Robert Wipfel" <rawipfel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:48 PM, in message
> <OF343F1147.8C643D1B- ON87257395.00254173- 88257395.00256BCA@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Todd
> Singleton <toddsing@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Robert,
>> good find. Yes, that would be great if you did that (compile
and check in
>> the linux binary).
>
> Okay, sorry about that
>
>> Also,
>> I got this error while doing the build tonite. I'm not sure
if it's you
>> or not, but looks like the DevAccess object needs to be checked
in with the
>> change below (.daTargetportWWN is not a part of the file being
built). Is
>> this something you are aware of? If not, please let me know.
I'll cut a
>> build as soon as I get the notification from you.
>>
>> [buildPlugin] ERROR - [ERROR]
>> org\eclipse\aperi\agent\probe\ProbeLinux.java#802:
>> devAccess.daTargetPortWWN cannot be resolved or is not a field
>
> It might be me - I get the error now too - ProbeLinux.java
now
> at HEAD is same as 1.3.2.1 as checked in 9/23 by sconstant
>
> Version 1.4 was my checkin, uhm, which I backed and restored
> to version 1.3.2.1 (the previous version)
>
> Who is sconstant? Is this code supposed to be in the build (it
> seems to have various other fixes that we need for e.g. /proc/scsi
> versus /sys/class/scsi_host discovery...
Todd,
I was working on a fix for bug #208708, had tested, and then checked
in these files.
Aperi/data/c/T-Storm/ProbeLinux.c 1.6
Aperi/bin/linux-ix86/libDataAgent.so 1.11
org.eclipse.aperi.agent.data/src/org.eclipse.aperi.agent.probe/ProbeLinux.java
1.4
org.eclipse.aperi.common/src/org.eclipse.aperi.TStorm.common/Filesystem.java
1.2
That's when I realized my changes were stale compared to HEAD...
It seems there had been a few checkins for "Self-Contained NAS profiles"
in the same files, plus fixes for /sys/class/scsi_host in ProbeLinux.java
For each of the files above, I did a Replace With previous version, to
put
them back the way they were before I checked in, and diff'd them just to
be sure.
HEAD should now be back to the state it was in before I started breaking
things - but I now also find that I can no longer compile ProbeLinux.java
for the same reason you see.
Hth,
Robert
_______________________________________________
aperi-dev mailing list
aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aperi-dev