| [ajdt-dev] AJ handle diffs - IJavaElement.getHandleIdentifier() vs. IRelationship.getSourceHandle() |
| Hello, I'm writing an Eclipse plug-in that uses handle identifiers to work with crosscutting relationship information. I *think* I'm seeing a slight variation in handle identifiers within AspectJ compilation units, depending on whether you're looking at an IJavaElement or a relationship that involves the IJavaElement. If you get the handle from IJavaElement.getHandleIdentifier(), the AspectJ compilation unit's name is preceded by "{": =handle-demo-aspects/src<handledemoaspects{HandleDemoAspect.aj}HandleDemoAspect&before However, if that IJavaElement is in a crosscutting relationship, and you get the handle from IRelationship.getSourceHandle(), the AspectJ compilation unit's name is preceded by "*": =handle-demo-aspects/src<handledemoaspects*HandleDemoAspect.aj}HandleDemoAspect&before From what I can tell, this only seems to happen within AspectJ compilation units. getHandleIdentifier() and getSourceHandler() both use "{" before Java compilation unit names: =handle-demo-aspects/src<handledemoaspects{HandleDemoClass.java[HandleDemoClass Am I doing something wrong, or should getHandleIdentifier() and getSourceHandler() both return the same thing? I've written a small plug-in that demonstrates the behavior, if you're interested. Thanks! Jeff |