|
|
|
Re: Vote for Eclipse [message #613 is a reply to message #591] |
Fri, 18 April 2003 21:33 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: bob.objfac.com
Not sure what the nomination process is. Eclipse does show up again in the
Most Innovative category.
Bob
"Scott Stanchfield" <scott@javadude.com> wrote in message
news:b7pjea$e55$1@rogue.oti.com...
> Anyone have any idea why Eclipse doesn't show up under categories like
> * Best Java App
> * Best Debugging Envronment
> * Best Team Dev tool
>
> ???
>
> IDEA, JBuilder, Netbeans and WSAD show up, but not Eclipse! Is someone
> stacking the cards so it looks like Eclipse is good for general IDE use
but
> not team use or debugging???
>
> -- Scott
>
>
> "K V" <reply@group.com> wrote in message
news:b7p7uq$62e$1@rogue.oti.com...
> > Eclipse is currently at number 1 at JDJ reader's choice for Best Java
IDE
> > environment:
> >
> > http://www.sys-con.com/java/readerschoice2003/liveupdate.cfm ?BType=9
> >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Vote for Eclipse [message #7373 is a reply to message #637] |
Mon, 28 April 2003 14:21 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: mqualizza.insurance-engine.com
Anders Biehl wrote:
> Where are the Apache tools? What kind of a lack-brain makes the nominations?
>
> -Anders
>
>
Which are you enjoying most? The fact that Sun doesn't appear on the best JVM
page, or the fact that XMLSpy seems to be *everywhere*? I always love these
awards. :-)
|
|
|
Re: Vote for Eclipse [message #8001 is a reply to message #7373] |
Mon, 28 April 2003 22:52 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: bob.objfac.com
"Marco Qualizza" <mqualizza@insurance-engine.com> wrote in message
news:b8jdd1$v2a$1@rogue.oti.com...
> Anders Biehl wrote:
> > Where are the Apache tools? What kind of a lack-brain makes the
nominations?
> Which are you enjoying most? The fact that Sun doesn't appear on the best
JVM
> page, or the fact that XMLSpy seems to be *everywhere*? I always love
these
> awards. :-)
They are very easy to manipulate. Many people have multiple email addresses
and their companies exhort them to "vote often".
Bob
|
|
|
Re: Vote for Eclipse [message #8027 is a reply to message #8001] |
Mon, 28 April 2003 22:56 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: bob.objfac.com
Damn, this was cross-posted! Hey Anders, that's not polite.
Bob
"Bob Foster" <bob@objfac.com> wrote in message
news:b8kamu$pq9$1@rogue.oti.com...
> "Marco Qualizza" <mqualizza@insurance-engine.com> wrote in message
> news:b8jdd1$v2a$1@rogue.oti.com...
> > Anders Biehl wrote:
> > > Where are the Apache tools? What kind of a lack-brain makes the
> nominations?
> > Which are you enjoying most? The fact that Sun doesn't appear on the
best
> JVM
> > page, or the fact that XMLSpy seems to be *everywhere*? I always love
> these
> > awards. :-)
>
> They are very easy to manipulate. Many people have multiple email
addresses
> and their companies exhort them to "vote often".
>
> Bob
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Vote for Eclipse [message #8495 is a reply to message #8001] |
Tue, 29 April 2003 13:44 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: reply.group.com
After the voting is closed, they audit to eliminate duplicate votes.
Inorder to cast your vote more than once, it is not just the email address,
you need to have multiple work phone numbers too.. I guess they are trying
their best to eliminate duplicate votes in their final audit.
And yes, there might be a certain amount of manipulation. Just imagine, all
IBM employees are asked to vote for IBM products, they will certainly out
number others.
"Bob Foster" <bob@objfac.com> wrote in message
news:b8kamu$pq9$1@rogue.oti.com...
> "Marco Qualizza" <mqualizza@insurance-engine.com> wrote in message
> news:b8jdd1$v2a$1@rogue.oti.com...
> > Anders Biehl wrote:
> > > Where are the Apache tools? What kind of a lack-brain makes the
> nominations?
> > Which are you enjoying most? The fact that Sun doesn't appear on the
best
> JVM
> > page, or the fact that XMLSpy seems to be *everywhere*? I always love
> these
> > awards. :-)
>
> They are very easy to manipulate. Many people have multiple email
addresses
> and their companies exhort them to "vote often".
>
> Bob
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Vote for Eclipse [message #9028 is a reply to message #8495] |
Tue, 29 April 2003 19:08 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: bob.objfac.com
"K V" <reply@group.com> wrote in message news:b8lvj6$1c4$1@rogue.oti.com...
> After the voting is closed, they audit to eliminate duplicate votes.
> Inorder to cast your vote more than once, it is not just the email
address,
> you need to have multiple work phone numbers too.. I guess they are
trying
> their best to eliminate duplicate votes in their final audit.
I'll bet they don't call all those numbers to see if they're real. ;-}
> And yes, there might be a certain amount of manipulation. Just imagine,
all
> IBM employees are asked to vote for IBM products, they will certainly out
> number others.
Places I've worked in the past, it was routine to ask all employees to vote
for company products. IBM would probably be embarrassed to do so, but many
companies have no shame.
Bob
|
|
|
Re: Vote for Eclipse [message #9049 is a reply to message #9028] |
Tue, 29 April 2003 19:06 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: mccull1.does.not.like.spam.us.ibm.com
No one has asked me to vote for IBM products, but then again, IBM is a big
company. Perhaps some in the Software Group associated with particular
products have been so instructed, but perhaps not. I seem to recall some
controversy over Oracle encouraging votes for some of their newer (J2EE)
products, but I could be mis-remembering that.
As for IBM, I wouldn't relish trying to get 300,000 people to do anything
quietly :)
-Andrew
P.S. Obviously, none of us (those on this NG) needs much convincing to vote
for Eclipse :)
<SNIP>
> Places I've worked in the past, it was routine to ask all employees to
vote
> for company products. IBM would probably be embarrassed to do so, but many
> companies have no shame.
>
> Bob
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03340 seconds