| BPMN2 support [message #857] |
Tue, 23 September 2008 17:35  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: michael.gebhart.googlemail.com
Hi,
thanks for this newsgroup. I've seen that the Model Development Tools
Project is working on a BPMN2 implementation. Why is this project part
of MDT and the BPMN modeler is part of STP?
Or does MDT only provide a metamodel and STP will provide a modeler? I
think that BPMN2 is a very important step in the BPMN history. Are there
any plans for BPMN2?
Greetings
Mike
|
|
|
| Re: BPMN2 support [message #886 is a reply to message #857] |
Tue, 23 September 2008 17:53  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: atoulme.intalio.com
Hello Michel,
yes, MDT is only working on the metamodel, so Eclipse has a reference
implementation of BPMN 2.0.
We aim to support that metamodel and remain backward compatible at the
same time of course.
Thanks,
Antoine
Michael Gebhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for this newsgroup. I've seen that the Model Development Tools
> Project is working on a BPMN2 implementation. Why is this project part
> of MDT and the BPMN modeler is part of STP?
>
> Or does MDT only provide a metamodel and STP will provide a modeler? I
> think that BPMN2 is a very important step in the BPMN history. Are there
> any plans for BPMN2?
>
> Greetings
>
> Mike
|
|
|
| Re: BPMN2 support [message #916 is a reply to message #886] |
Wed, 24 September 2008 07:16 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: michael.gebhart.googlemail.com
Hi Antoine,
great news, thanks! Is there a roadmap for BPMN 2?
Greetings
Michael
> Hello Michel,
>
> yes, MDT is only working on the metamodel, so Eclipse has a reference
> implementation of BPMN 2.0.
>
> We aim to support that metamodel and remain backward compatible at the
> same time of course.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Antoine
>
> Michael Gebhart wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for this newsgroup. I've seen that the Model Development Tools
>> Project is working on a BPMN2 implementation. Why is this project part
>> of MDT and the BPMN modeler is part of STP?
>>
>> Or does MDT only provide a metamodel and STP will provide a modeler? I
>> think that BPMN2 is a very important step in the BPMN history. Are there
>> any plans for BPMN2?
>>
>> Greetings
>>
>> Mike
>
|
|
|
| Re: BPMN2 support [message #943 is a reply to message #916] |
Wed, 24 September 2008 11:52 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: atoulme.intalio.com
Michael Gebhart wrote:
> Hi Antoine,
>
> great news, thanks! Is there a roadmap for BPMN 2?
Hi Michael,
best if you ask them directly. I have added them in CC.
Thanks,
Antoine
|
|
|
| Re: BPMN2 support [message #1245 is a reply to message #943] |
Tue, 30 September 2008 16:02 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: Kenn.Hussey.embarcadero.com
The roadmap for BPMN2 is very much dependent on what happens at the OMG. At
this point, I believe the final (supposedly unified) submission is due at
the December technical meeting; this submission will become adopted if
voting is successful, and will likely be the basis for the first release of
the BPMN2 project (0.7), scheduled for June 2009.
Kenn
"Antoine Toulme" <atoulme@intalio.com> wrote in message
news:gbd9ls$cve$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Michael Gebhart wrote:
>> Hi Antoine,
>>
>> great news, thanks! Is there a roadmap for BPMN 2?
> Hi Michael,
>
> best if you ask them directly. I have added them in CC.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Antoine
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03735 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
