Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Language IDEs » ServerTools (WTP) » The xml editor recognizes a single an end tag as valid xml
The xml editor recognizes a single an end tag as valid xml [message #66568] Thu, 20 January 2005 16:11 Go to next message
Raphael A. Bauer is currently offline Raphael A. BauerFriend
Messages: 47
Registered: July 2009
Member
Hi everybody,

I just got stuck with something strange.
If I create a new xml file, open it with the M2 XML Editor and just
write something like </test> the XML Editor doesn't underline it or
mark it as an error.

The other way round works perfectly: Only a beginning tag without an
end tag throws an error.

Is that issue known to anybody?

Thanks,

Raphael
Re: The xml editor recognizes a single an end tag as valid xml [message #66890 is a reply to message #66568] Fri, 21 January 2005 04:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
David Williams is currently offline David WilliamsFriend
Messages: 722
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:11:32 +0100, Raphael A. Bauer <raphael.bauer@temis-group.com> wrote:


>
> Is that issue known to anybody?
>

Nope, not known. (But not too surprising, given our "fault tolerant parser" actually creates an element in taht case). We are hoping to improve much of that type of validation in future milestones. But I'll suggest you take one of two actions ... if its from a "real life" case that caused you some greif, please open a bugzilla, and we can try and be sure that case is handled better in future milestones (attaching example files, exact scenerios, or outright JUnit tests are always appreciated). Alternatively, if this was just an "oddity" you noticed, you might wait until validation is re-vamped and try it again.
Re: The xml editor recognizes a single an end tag as valid xml [message #66911 is a reply to message #66890] Fri, 21 January 2005 09:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Raphael A. Bauer is currently offline Raphael A. BauerFriend
Messages: 47
Registered: July 2009
Member
David Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:11:32 +0100, Raphael A. Bauer
> <raphael.bauer@temis-group.com> wrote:
>> Is that issue known to anybody?
> Nope, not known. (But not too surprising, given our "fault tolerant
> parser" actually creates an element in taht case). We are hoping to
> improve much of that type of validation in future milestones. But I'll
> suggest you take one of two actions ... if its from a "real life" case
> that caused you some greif, please open a bugzilla, and we can try and
> be sure that case is handled better in future milestones (attaching
> example files, exact scenerios, or outright JUnit tests are always
> appreciated). Alternatively, if this was just an "oddity" you noticed,
> you might wait until validation is re-vamped and try it again.

I just digged a bit deeper and unfortunately I discovered some other
strange xsd validation behaviours...

I'll investigate these things in detail, and post them with examples to
the newsgroup within the next 2 weeks, so you can decide what's a
bugzilla thing and what not...

thanks,

Raphael
Re: The xml editor recognizes a single an end tag as valid xml [message #66955 is a reply to message #66911] Fri, 21 January 2005 21:46 Go to previous message
David Williams is currently offline David WilliamsFriend
Messages: 722
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:53:40 +0100, Raphael A. Bauer <raphael.bauer@temis-group.com> wrote:

> I'll investigate these things in detail, and post them with examples to
> the newsgroup within the next 2 weeks, so you can decide what's a
> bugzilla thing and what not...

Ok, thanks for digging and documenting. But ... it'd be better if *you* decided what's worth a bugzilla and what's not. Clients and Users opening bugzilla reports are our way of knowing and tracking "didn't work as expected". Problem reports to newsgroups won't deliberately be ignored, but in the course of things are sometimes lost and in general receive less priority. Thanks again.
Previous Topic:m4 work with webtools?
Next Topic:Failure while refactoring
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Nov 09 05:02:45 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02321 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top