|
Re: Problems with deriving types [message #65126 is a reply to message #65101] |
Tue, 29 November 2005 18:16 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
Klaas,
I suppose this could be related to
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=101761 but that should be
in 2.1 already. I'll have a look at the larger example if that's the
only place the problem happens...
Klaas Dellschaft wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with extending a complexType with an attribute group.
> The following types are defined:
>
>
> <xs:complexType name="A">
> <xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
> <xs:element name="source" type="element1"/>
> <xs:element name="value" type="element2"/>
> <xs:group ref="ns:group"/>
> </xs:choice>
> <xs:attributeGroup ref="ns:attributeGroup1"/>
> </xs:complexType>
>
> <xs:complexType name="B">
> <xs:complexContent>
> <xs:extension base="A">
> <xs:attributeGroup ref="ns:attributeGroup2"/>
> </xs:extension>
> </xs:complexContent>
> </xs:complexType>
>
>
> This is part of a very large schema. When validating this schema, I
> get the following error message for the type B: "The basetype has
> 'elementOnly' content so this extended type must also".
>
> And indeed, when I look at the contentTypeCategory of B, it has
> "emtpy" while A has a contentTypeCategory of "elementOnly". Until now
> I failed to reduce the large schema to a minimal schema reproducing
> the problem. Because when I reduce it only to those definition
> (including the referenced definitions), the contentTypeCategory of B
> is also "elementOnly", so that the error doesn't occur. Probably you
> have any idea, why the contentTypeCategory of B may become "empty"
> sometimes?
>
> I got the problem using XSD 2.1. Until now I had no time to test it
> with more recent versions of XSD.
>
> Cheers
> Klaas
|
|
|
|
Re: Problems with deriving types [message #597245 is a reply to message #65101] |
Tue, 29 November 2005 18:16 |
Ed Merks Messages: 33252 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Klaas,
I suppose this could be related to
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=101761 but that should be
in 2.1 already. I'll have a look at the larger example if that's the
only place the problem happens...
Klaas Dellschaft wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with extending a complexType with an attribute group.
> The following types are defined:
>
>
> <xs:complexType name="A">
> <xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
> <xs:element name="source" type="element1"/>
> <xs:element name="value" type="element2"/>
> <xs:group ref="ns:group"/>
> </xs:choice>
> <xs:attributeGroup ref="ns:attributeGroup1"/>
> </xs:complexType>
>
> <xs:complexType name="B">
> <xs:complexContent>
> <xs:extension base="A">
> <xs:attributeGroup ref="ns:attributeGroup2"/>
> </xs:extension>
> </xs:complexContent>
> </xs:complexType>
>
>
> This is part of a very large schema. When validating this schema, I
> get the following error message for the type B: "The basetype has
> 'elementOnly' content so this extended type must also".
>
> And indeed, when I look at the contentTypeCategory of B, it has
> "emtpy" while A has a contentTypeCategory of "elementOnly". Until now
> I failed to reduce the large schema to a minimal schema reproducing
> the problem. Because when I reduce it only to those definition
> (including the referenced definitions), the contentTypeCategory of B
> is also "elementOnly", so that the error doesn't occur. Probably you
> have any idea, why the contentTypeCategory of B may become "empty"
> sometimes?
>
> I got the problem using XSD 2.1. Until now I had no time to test it
> with more recent versions of XSD.
>
> Cheers
> Klaas
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03218 seconds