|
|
| Re: epl-v10 Question [message #59424 is a reply to message #59400] |
Mon, 13 July 2009 15:29   |
 Bill Winspur
Messages: 180
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Ed Merks wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Ask your lawyer if you want legal advice. :-P
>
> My free non-legal advice is that as long as you make the source code of
> your modified variant publicly available, you're doing exactly what's
> required.
>
>
>
> Bill Winspur wrote:
>> I would like to create a (probably renamed) variant of Class
>> XMLMemento (and inteface IMemento) that is not dependent on package
>> org.eclipse.ui.internal, and would package the modified class as a jar
>> to be used:
>>
>> 1. In junit test cases in launched from eclipse, but not running in the
>> plugin environment.
>>
>> 2. In external tools launched from eclipse.
>>
>> 3. In java applications completely separate from eclipse.
>>
>> Can I acomplish this without violating the the terms of epl-v10, under
>> which XMLMemento is currently distributed?
>>
>> Bill Winspur
Thanks Ed,
However, being a recluse by nature, I have never made code publicly
available. In all seriousness, could you suggest a low-cost way that I
could do that?
Bill
|
|
|
| Re: epl-v10 Question [message #59448 is a reply to message #59424] |
Mon, 13 July 2009 16:04 |
Ed Merks
Messages: 33252
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Bill,
Dump it in a zip file and have a link for it only any publicly
accessible website. Or open a bugzilla, and dump it there; even if it's
closed or rejected, it will still be recorded...
Bill Winspur wrote:
> Ed Merks wrote:
>> Bill,
>>
>> Ask your lawyer if you want legal advice. :-P
>>
>> My free non-legal advice is that as long as you make the source code
>> of your modified variant publicly available, you're doing exactly
>> what's required.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bill Winspur wrote:
>>> I would like to create a (probably renamed) variant of Class
>>> XMLMemento (and inteface IMemento) that is not dependent on package
>>> org.eclipse.ui.internal, and would package the modified class as a
>>> jar to be used:
>>>
>>> 1. In junit test cases in launched from eclipse, but not running in the
>>> plugin environment.
>>>
>>> 2. In external tools launched from eclipse.
>>>
>>> 3. In java applications completely separate from eclipse.
>>>
>>> Can I acomplish this without violating the the terms of epl-v10,
>>> under which XMLMemento is currently distributed?
>>>
>>> Bill Winspur
> Thanks Ed,
> However, being a recluse by nature, I have never made code publicly
> available. In all seriousness, could you suggest a low-cost way that I
> could do that?
> Bill
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
| Re: epl-v10 Question [message #59473 is a reply to message #59448] |
Mon, 13 July 2009 17:04 |
Bill Winspur
Messages: 180
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Ed Merks wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Dump it in a zip file and have a link for it only any publicly
> accessible website. Or open a bugzilla, and dump it there; even if it's
> closed or rejected, it will still be recorded...
>
>
> Bill Winspur wrote:
>> Ed Merks wrote:
>>> Bill,
>>>
>>> Ask your lawyer if you want legal advice. :-P
>>>
>>> My free non-legal advice is that as long as you make the source code
>>> of your modified variant publicly available, you're doing exactly
>>> what's required.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bill Winspur wrote:
>>>> I would like to create a (probably renamed) variant of Class
>>>> XMLMemento (and inteface IMemento) that is not dependent on package
>>>> org.eclipse.ui.internal, and would package the modified class as a
>>>> jar to be used:
>>>>
>>>> 1. In junit test cases in launched from eclipse, but not running in the
>>>> plugin environment.
>>>>
>>>> 2. In external tools launched from eclipse.
>>>>
>>>> 3. In java applications completely separate from eclipse.
>>>>
>>>> Can I acomplish this without violating the the terms of epl-v10,
>>>> under which XMLMemento is currently distributed?
>>>>
>>>> Bill Winspur
>> Thanks Ed,
>> However, being a recluse by nature, I have never made code publicly
>> available. In all seriousness, could you suggest a low-cost way that I
>> could do that?
>> Bill
Will do, one of those. Thanks, Bill.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03718 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
