|
Re: [Announce] QVT Relations implementation [message #56724 is a reply to message #56697] |
Wed, 08 August 2007 15:58 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Solstice/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](theme/Solstice/images/down.png) |
Eclipse User![Friend of Eclipse Friend](/donate/web-api/friends_decorator.php?email=) |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: quentin.glineur.obeo.fr
Hello,
As the lead of the Eclipse QVT Relations component, I am very happy to
see that ikv++ technologies have interests meetings ours.
I look forward to take cognizance of ikv++ technologies will to bring
contributions to the eclipse (modeling) community.
Best regards,
Quentin GLINEUR
Hajo Eichler a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> ikv++ technologies provides an implementation of OMG's QVT Relations for
> non-commercial use with its medini QVT engine.
>
> For more details please visit:
> http://www.ikv.de/index.php?option=com_content&task=view &id=75&Itemid=77
>
> Best regards,
> Hajo Eichler
|
|
|
|
Re: [Announce] QVT Relations implementation [message #57256 is a reply to message #56834] |
Fri, 10 August 2007 07:39 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Solstice/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](theme/Solstice/images/down.png) |
Hajo Eichler![Friend of Eclipse Friend](/donate/web-api/friends_decorator.php?email=hajo.eichler%40gmx.de) Messages: 25 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Dear Frédéric and Quentin,
first of all we are glad to be in contact with you and the community to talk and
discuss about QVT Relations.
To answer your question about our plans for contributions to the eclipse M2M
project, we need time for internal discussion on our side.
But, one contribution point we want to start with now, would be a set of QVT
Relations examples (which may result in a kind of conformance test). How should we
proceed with this?
Best regards,
Hajo Eichler
Frédéric Jouault schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> As the M2M project lead, I am glad, like Quentin, to see that the
> Eclipse M2M technology attracts new contributors.
>
> Could you please be more specific regarding the parts of your
> implementation that you plan to contribute to Eclipse?
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Frédéric Jouault
>
>
> Hajo Eichler wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> ikv++ technologies provides an implementation of OMG's QVT Relations
>> for non-commercial use with its medini QVT engine.
>>
>> For more details please visit:
>> http://www.ikv.de/index.php?option=com_content&task=view &id=75&Itemid=77
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Hajo Eichler
|
|
|
|
Re: [Announce] QVT Relations implementation [message #57352 is a reply to message #57330] |
Fri, 10 August 2007 10:08 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Solstice/images/up.png) |
Eclipse User![Friend of Eclipse Friend](/donate/web-api/friends_decorator.php?email=) |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: quentin.glineur.obeo.fr
Hi all,
Frédéric Jouault a écrit :
> Dear Hajo,
>
>
>> But, one contribution point we want to start with now, would be a set of
>> QVT Relations examples (which may result in a kind of conformance test).
>
> Working on this library of QVT Relations transformations is indeed
> already planned.
>
>
>> How should we proceed with this?
>
> I let Quentin answer this question.
>
I am currently designing the web page for QVT Relations explaining the
process to submit a QVT Relations transformation (through Bugzilla).
I shall soon complete this post to announce it !
>
>> To answer your question about our plans for contributions to the eclipse
>> M2M project, we need time for internal discussion on our side.
>
> Eclipse newsgroups are not intended to publicize proprietary tools.
> Therefore, we understood from your initial post that you plan to
> contribute parts of your QVT Relations engine.
>
> What we need to know is which part you may contribute to the QVT
> Relations component, and when. This way, we can work on a common
> roadmap and avoid effort duplication.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Frédéric Jouault
In hopes of productive collaborations,
Quentin GLINEUR
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03904 seconds