GridLayout [message #56929] |
Sat, 03 November 2007 20:42 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: andy.freenet.de
Hi,
is there a Reason why you dont support qooxdoo GridLayout in RAP?
Andy
|
|
|
Re: GridLayout [message #56985 is a reply to message #56929] |
Sat, 03 November 2007 21:37 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: rsternberg.innoopract.com
Hi Andy,
Andy schrieb:
> is there a Reason why you dont support qooxdoo GridLayout in RAP?
to improve performance, we deliver a subset of qooxdoo that contains
only those classes that are actually needed by RAP. Do you need the
GridLayout for a custom widget? If you really need it you could include
a copy of the qx GridLayout class.
Best regards,
Ralf
|
|
|
Re: GridLayout [message #57010 is a reply to message #56985] |
Sat, 03 November 2007 22:10 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: andy.freenet.de
Hi,
yes, thats exactly what I did,
I implemented a Customwidget for the Qooxdoo-Datechooser which uses the
GridLayout, which works
quite well, but I had to include 8 js-Classes from qooxdoo in the whole.
I just wondered if I missed something, but then it is propably the right
way how I did it.
Thank you.
Andy
|
|
|
Re: GridLayout [message #57034 is a reply to message #57010] |
Sat, 03 November 2007 22:21 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: andy.freenet.de
By the way,
perhaps there is still a better way to do this,
there are sometimes difficulties in the order of the included libraries.
Is there a way to force an Order how the libs are included?
AFAI can see, the included libs are just copied into the JS-Source of the
Application, but not always in the order of Inclution, right?
Andy
|
|
|
Re: GridLayout [message #57082 is a reply to message #57034] |
Sat, 03 November 2007 22:50 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: rsternberg.innoopract.com
Andy schrieb:
> By the way,
> perhaps there is still a better way to do this,
> there are sometimes difficulties in the order of the included libraries.
> Is there a way to force an Order how the libs are included?
>
> AFAI can see, the included libs are just copied into the JS-Source of the
> Application, but not always in the order of Inclution, right?
May be it's a good idea to concatenate all your js classes into one
single js file. Not only does this preserve their order, it is also
quicker to load one bigger file than a couple of smaller ones.
I think the registered JS files shold not depend on one another.
Ralf
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05086 seconds