Eclipse Community Forums: EMF "Technology" (Ecore Tools, EMFatic, etc) » JET templates for interfaces missing with EMF 2.2.1

Home » Modeling » EMF "Technology" (Ecore Tools, EMFatic, etc) » JET templates for interfaces missing with EMF 2.2.1

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

JET templates for interfaces missing with EMF 2.2.1 [message #56780]

Mon, 09 October 2006 08:45

nalaka gamage

Messages: 30
Registered: July 2009

Member

Hi All,
We had been using EMF 2.0.1 for code generation using JETEmitter
templates. EMF 2.0.1 codegen used to include following JET templates.
Interface_
PackageInterface_
FactoryInterface_
Now I found that EMF codgen 2.2.1 no longer included these templates. Does
that mean generated code (using JET templates) no longer include
XXXXPackage interface class which will be implemented by the
XXXXPackageImpl class ?
Thanks
Nalaka

Report message to a moderator

Re: JET templates for interfaces missing with EMF 2.2.1 [message #56808 is a reply to message #56780]

Mon, 09 October 2006 13:09

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com

Nalaka,

In the 2.2 development cycle we introduce an option that allows clients
to generate code that combines the interface and the implementation into
a single generated result. For this reason, Interface.javajet and
Class.javajet were merged into a single template able to generate the
interface, the impl, or a combined result. A similar thing has happened
for the factory and the package.

Nalaka Gamage wrote:
> Hi All,
> We had been using EMF 2.0.1 for code generation using JETEmitter
> templates. EMF 2.0.1 codegen used to include following JET templates.
> Interface_
> PackageInterface_
> FactoryInterface_
> Now I found that EMF codgen 2.2.1 no longer included these templates.
> Does that mean generated code (using JET templates) no longer include
> XXXXPackage interface class which will be implemented by the
> XXXXPackageImpl class ?
> Thanks
> Nalaka
>
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: JET templates for interfaces missing with EMF 2.2.1 [message #56835 is a reply to message #56808]

Tue, 10 October 2006 10:47

nalaka gamage

Messages: 30
Registered: July 2009

Member

Thanks Merks.

Nalaka

Ed Merks wrote:

> Nalaka,

> In the 2.2 development cycle we introduce an option that allows clients
> to generate code that combines the interface and the implementation into
> a single generated result. For this reason, Interface.javajet and
> Class.javajet were merged into a single template able to generate the
> interface, the impl, or a combined result. A similar thing has happened
> for the factory and the package.

> Nalaka Gamage wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> We had been using EMF 2.0.1 for code generation using JETEmitter
>> templates. EMF 2.0.1 codegen used to include following JET templates.
>> Interface_
>> PackageInterface_
>> FactoryInterface_
>> Now I found that EMF codgen 2.2.1 no longer included these templates.
>> Does that mean generated code (using JET templates) no longer include
>> XXXXPackage interface class which will be implemented by the
>> XXXXPackageImpl class ?
>> Thanks
>> Nalaka
>>
>>
>>

Report message to a moderator

Re: JET templates for interfaces missing with EMF 2.2.1 [message #593785 is a reply to message #56780]

Mon, 09 October 2006 13:09

Ed Merks

Messages: 33252
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Nalaka,

In the 2.2 development cycle we introduce an option that allows clients
to generate code that combines the interface and the implementation into
a single generated result. For this reason, Interface.javajet and
Class.javajet were merged into a single template able to generate the
interface, the impl, or a combined result. A similar thing has happened
for the factory and the package.

Nalaka Gamage wrote:
> Hi All,
> We had been using EMF 2.0.1 for code generation using JETEmitter
> templates. EMF 2.0.1 codegen used to include following JET templates.
> Interface_
> PackageInterface_
> FactoryInterface_
> Now I found that EMF codgen 2.2.1 no longer included these templates.
> Does that mean generated code (using JET templates) no longer include
> XXXXPackage interface class which will be implemented by the
> XXXXPackageImpl class ?
> Thanks
> Nalaka
>
>
>

Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/

Report message to a moderator