|
|
|
|
Re: Toolchain for source code generation from UML? [message #557974 is a reply to message #557396] |
Thu, 09 September 2010 16:20 |
|
Does not really matter, since the component is just an MWE component that instantiatesan Eclipse UML2 metamodel instance. From that it can be processed by all of these frameworks. However, JET would always be my last choice, then Acceleo, and first Xpand. Xpand has the most natural way to handle UML models.
My 2 cents...
~Karsten
Need professional support for Xtext, EMF, Eclipse IDE?
Go to: http://devhub.karakun.com
Twitter : @kthoms
Blog : www.karsten-thoms.de
|
|
|
Re: Toolchain for source code generation from UML? [message #558271 is a reply to message #557396] |
Fri, 10 September 2010 17:33 |
Yannick Duchene (Hibou57) Messages: 50 Registered: September 2010 Location: Metz (France - Europe) |
Member |
|
|
Juergen Weber wrote on Tue, 07 September 2010 05:35 | Hi, I am bit overwhelmed by the many Eclipse modeling projects.
What would I use to read in an (Enterprise Architect) UML model in XMI format and to generate code from it? What would be the tool chain?
Xpand, Acceleo or JET ?
|
I would recommend Acceleo, as it is based on MOF M2T (MOF Model to Text) standard language.
Using standard language helps reliability.
Note: TBH, Acceleo make use of non-standard, while still well designed, proprietary extensions.
Here is a link to the standard:
http://www.omg.org/spec/MOFM2T/1.0/
while you may still benefits doing a bit of research using your favorites search-engines.
P.S. If you use Acceleo, be sure to use the latest version 3, as prior version was not conforming to the MOF M2T standard.
http://www.acceleo.org
[Updated on: Fri, 10 September 2010 17:34] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03828 seconds