equinox vs. standard Plug-in Project [message #54271] |
Tue, 06 December 2005 14:47 ![Go to next message Go to next message](theme/Solstice/images/down.png) |
Eclipse User![Friend of Eclipse Friend](/donate/web-api/friends_decorator.php?email=) |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: guennadi.vanine.iknow.pt
Hi,
Eclipse3.2 New Plug-in Project wizard gives an 2 radio-buttons (exclusive)
option:
- Eclipse version
- an OSGi framework
The latter has a combobxo with 2 elements:
- Equinox
- standard
I searched Help, not a single result.
Might be I do not understand smth:
whom are Eclipse features for if there is no description of them?
There are some people that are forced to use it in work (and have no time
for jokes)
Guennadi Vanine
|
|
|
Re: equinox vs. standard Plug-in Project [message #54353 is a reply to message #54271] |
Wed, 07 December 2005 00:17 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Solstice/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](theme/Solstice/images/down.png) |
Eclipse User![Friend of Eclipse Friend](/donate/web-api/friends_decorator.php?email=) |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: pascal.ibm.canada
Equinox is an implementation of the OSGi 4.0 spec, but it also has some
added features (mostly in new headers in the manifest)
If you are creating a "standard" bundle then the tooling will make sure
that you do not use any Equinox specific feature when you are writing
your bundle.
Guennadi wrote:
> Hi,
> Eclipse3.2 New Plug-in Project wizard gives an 2 radio-buttons (exclusive)
> option:
> - Eclipse version
> - an OSGi framework
>
> The latter has a combobxo with 2 elements:
> - Equinox
> - standard
>
> I searched Help, not a single result.
>
> Might be I do not understand smth:
> whom are Eclipse features for if there is no description of them?
>
> There are some people that are forced to use it in work (and have no time
> for jokes)
>
> Guennadi Vanine
>
>
|
|
|
Re: equinox vs. standard Plug-in Project [message #54415 is a reply to message #54353] |
Thu, 08 December 2005 15:49 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Solstice/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](theme/Solstice/images/down.png) |
Eclipse User![Friend of Eclipse Friend](/donate/web-api/friends_decorator.php?email=) |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: vgv8.yahoo.com.br
Hi, Pascal,
thanks for yor your help but it did not added to what I have known before.
I tried to use standard and Eclipse3.0 and I have not plugin.xml in created
plugin project as well as I di not get any compatibility with previous
plugin projects or workbenches.
Where can I read about this options? What value they should add and how they
are really function now.
Guennadi Vanine
"Pascal Rapicault" <pascal@ibm.canada> wrote in message
news:dn59n1$vdo$1@news.eclipse.org...
> Equinox is an implementation of the OSGi 4.0 spec, but it also has some
> added features (mostly in new headers in the manifest)
>
> If you are creating a "standard" bundle then the tooling will make sure
> that you do not use any Equinox specific feature when you are writing
> your bundle.
>
> Guennadi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Eclipse3.2 New Plug-in Project wizard gives an 2 radio-buttons
(exclusive)
> > option:
> > - Eclipse version
> > - an OSGi framework
> >
> > The latter has a combobxo with 2 elements:
> > - Equinox
> > - standard
> >
> > I searched Help, not a single result.
> >
> > Might be I do not understand smth:
> > whom are Eclipse features for if there is no description of them?
> >
> > There are some people that are forced to use it in work (and have no
time
> > for jokes)
> >
> > Guennadi Vanine
> >
> >
|
|
|
Re: equinox vs. standard Plug-in Project [message #54760 is a reply to message #54415] |
Mon, 12 December 2005 23:13 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Solstice/images/up.png) |
Eclipse User![Friend of Eclipse Friend](/donate/web-api/friends_decorator.php?email=) |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: jeff_nospam_mcaffer.ca.ibm.com
Do you want a plugin.xml? If you do, look for the extension or extension
point links on the plugin overview page in the plugin editor or just make a
plugin.xml.
The additional capabilities are for plugin developers. Many of them are
handled automaticaly if you say you are developing an Eclipse plugin.
There is no doc in the help as 3.2 is still under development.
Jeff
"Guennadi Vanine" <vgv8@yahoo.com.br> wrote in message
news:dn9kmp$6gd$1@news.eclipse.org...
> Hi, Pascal,
> thanks for yor your help but it did not added to what I have known before.
> I tried to use standard and Eclipse3.0 and I have not plugin.xml in
created
> plugin project as well as I di not get any compatibility with previous
> plugin projects or workbenches.
>
> Where can I read about this options? What value they should add and how
they
> are really function now.
> Guennadi Vanine
> "Pascal Rapicault" <pascal@ibm.canada> wrote in message
> news:dn59n1$vdo$1@news.eclipse.org...
> > Equinox is an implementation of the OSGi 4.0 spec, but it also has some
> > added features (mostly in new headers in the manifest)
> >
> > If you are creating a "standard" bundle then the tooling will make sure
> > that you do not use any Equinox specific feature when you are writing
> > your bundle.
> >
> > Guennadi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Eclipse3.2 New Plug-in Project wizard gives an 2 radio-buttons
> (exclusive)
> > > option:
> > > - Eclipse version
> > > - an OSGi framework
> > >
> > > The latter has a combobxo with 2 elements:
> > > - Equinox
> > > - standard
> > >
> > > I searched Help, not a single result.
> > >
> > > Might be I do not understand smth:
> > > whom are Eclipse features for if there is no description of them?
> > >
> > > There are some people that are forced to use it in work (and have no
> time
> > > for jokes)
> > >
> > > Guennadi Vanine
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04285 seconds