Home » Archived » M2M (model-to-model transformation) » [QVTO] Inline Object Creation(Creating attributes for classes usign inline object creation)
| [QVTO] Inline Object Creation [message #533898] |
Mon, 17 May 2010 12:40  |
 Siegfried Nolte
Messages: 48
Registered: August 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Hi QVTO-folks,
there is something wrong with the following mapping resulting in different syntactical errors with respect to the "object (p) ... "construction :
mapping Class::transformClassesWithInlineObject () : Class
{
name := self.name;
ownedAttribute := self.ownedAttribute->object (p) Property
{
name := p.name;
};
}
I took this from a similar sample of the specification (p49 - inline mapping). Maybe I should take
ownedAttribute += self.ownedAttribute->object (p) Property
{
name := p.name;
};
but that doesn't work either. And yes, I know, I can do this sample with a mapping as well, but I need a bit of help with inline mapping.
By the way, I'm working with the Galileo version of QVTO, and the metamodel is UML2.
Thanks,
Siegfried
[Updated on: Mon, 17 May 2010 12:41] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
| Re: [QVTO] Inline Object Creation [message #534111 is a reply to message #533898] |
Tue, 18 May 2010 06:04  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: dhendriksREMOVE_THIS.tueREMOVE.THIS.nl
Siegfried wrote:
> Hi QVTO-folks,
>
> there is something wrong with the following mapping resulting in
> different syntactical errors with respect to the "object (p) ...
> "construction :
>
> mapping Class::transformClassesWithInlineObject () : Class
> {
> name := self.name;
> ownedAttribute := self.ownedAttribute->object (p) Property {
> name := p.name;
> }; }
>
> I took this from a similar sample of the specification (p49 - inline
> mapping). Maybe I should take
> ownedAttribute += self.ownedAttribute->object (p) Property {
> name := p.name;
> };
> but that doesn't work either. And yes, I know, I can do this sample with
> a mapping as well, but I need a bit of help with inline mapping.
> By the way, I'm working with the Galileo version of QVTO.
> Thanks, Siegfried
Hello Siegfried,
Maybe you can write it like this:
....
ownedAttribute := self.ownedAttribute
->collect(p | object Property { name := p.name; });
...
Hope this helps,
Dennis
|
|
| |
| Re: [QVTO] Inline Object Creation [message #534821 is a reply to message #534538] |
Thu, 20 May 2010 12:58 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: dhendriksREMOVE_THIS.tueREMOVE.THIS.nl
Hello Siegfried,
> yes, it helps, as OCL constructions often do when QVT doesn't. Though I
> would like to stay near to the specification example (p.49 below)
I couldn't find this on page 49 (of this document:
http://www.omg.org/spec/QVT/1.0/PDF/)...
But if an example from the official specification doesn't work, I think
you should definitely file a bug report.
> far as I can see, this sample doesn't work with QVT-O, does it?
I only know QVTo. The line I proposed:
ownedAttribute := self.ownedAttribute
->collect(p | object Property { name := p.name; });
should work in Qvto, I think. That is, you should put it inside a
mapping, obviously. Why do you think it doesn't work in QVTo?
Dennis
|
|
| |
| Re: [QVTO] Inline Object Creation [message #534908 is a reply to message #534887] |
Thu, 20 May 2010 15:37 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: dhendriksREMOVE_THIS.tueREMOVE.THIS.nl
Siegfried wrote:
> Hello Dennis,
>
> sorry, you are right, it's page 51, chapter 8.1.6, the 2nd code sample
> describing inline mapping. There you can find
> column := self.attribute->object(a) Column
> {
> name=a.name; ...
> };
>
> This doesn't work with my QVTO (2.0.0). I'm preparing a QVT workshop and
> so I want to be near to the Spec.
> The OCL collect sample works fine and it does the job, so I wasn't going
> to post a bug.
> Best wishes,
> Siegfried
>
Hello Siegfried,
if something doesn't work as it should a bugzilla should always be
created, to make sure that it will work at some point in the future. If
you tried to use it, other people will as well. By creating the bugzilla
you help the entire community in getting a better product...
Best wishes,
Dennis
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Jan 03 00:47:07 GMT 2025
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03604 seconds |
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
