Eclipse Community Forums: Remote Application Platform (RAP)

Help

Home

Home » Eclipse Projects » Remote Application Platform (RAP) » applications as entry point

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

applications as entry point [message #518874]

Fri, 05 March 2010 10:25

Ralf Ebert

Messages: 168
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

I noticed the following things regarding RAP entry points:

- When an application ID is used as entry point, it is not qualified with the Bundle
Symbolic name as in RCP. I think the usage of an application id should be the same,
qualified format in RCP and RAP (com.example.somebundle.myapp vs. myapp)

- The RAP run configuration doesn't allow to leave the entry point ID empty. It should,
because you can define a default entry point for a servlet.

- The branding extension point doesn't allow to specify an application ID as
defaultEntryPointId.

Greetings,

Ralf

--
http://www.ralfebert.de/blog/eclipsercp/

Report message to a moderator

Re: applications as entry point [message #519275 is a reply to message #518874]

Mon, 08 March 2010 11:04

Rüdiger Herrmann

Messages: 581
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Ralf,

thanks for the input. In order address and/or discuss the issues, it
would be good to have them as separate bugs. Would you mind filing them?

TIA
Rüdiger

On 05.03.2010 11:25, Ralf Ebert wrote:
> I noticed the following things regarding RAP entry points:
>
> - When an application ID is used as entry point, it is not qualified
> with the Bundle Symbolic name as in RCP. I think the usage of an
> application id should be the same, qualified format in RCP and RAP
> (com.example.somebundle.myapp vs. myapp)
>
> - The RAP run configuration doesn't allow to leave the entry point ID
> empty. It should, because you can define a default entry point for a
> servlet.
>
> - The branding extension point doesn't allow to specify an application
> ID as defaultEntryPointId.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Ralf
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: applications as entry point [message #519296 is a reply to message #518874]

Mon, 08 March 2010 12:35

Benjamin Muskalla

Messages: 338
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Hi Ralf,

see comments inline.

Ralf Ebert wrote:
> I noticed the following things regarding RAP entry points:
>
> - When an application ID is used as entry point, it is not qualified
> with the Bundle Symbolic name as in RCP. I think the usage of an
> application id should be the same, qualified format in RCP and RAP
> (com.example.somebundle.myapp vs. myapp)
This was done by intention as otherwise, RAP developers would be forced
to expose bundle ids to the outside world. That's the reason why we
decided to go with the simple id instead of the full qualified one.

>
> - The RAP run configuration doesn't allow to leave the entry point ID
> empty. It should, because you can define a default entry point for a
> servlet.
Yep, the launcher should handle this case too. Please open a bug.

>
> - The branding extension point doesn't allow to specify an application
> ID as defaultEntryPointId.
In the branding, you should be able to use the fully qualified id of
your application to refer to it as defaultEntrypiont (eg.
com.example.somebundle.myapp). I'm sorry to say that the PDE tooling
cannot help you in this case as the attribute refers to two distinct
extension types.

Hope that helps
Benny

>
> Greetings,
>
> Ralf
>
>

--
Benjamin Muskalla | EclipseSource Karlsruhe
http://www.eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	MultiLanguage by default in RAP start configurations?
Next Topic:	[ANN] Google Visualizations Available for RAP

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Sun Dec 22 06:32:53 GMT 2024

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter