Home » Archived » XML Schema Definition (XSD) » Re: EMF, SDO & XSD Update Site (was Re: EMF Update Site)
Re: EMF, SDO & XSD Update Site (was Re: EMF Update Site) [message #42634] |
Wed, 28 April 2004 20:07 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: codeslave.ca.ibm.com
Okay, so this is a really old thread, but as of today I've got the first
iteration of an Update Manager-capable site for updating EMF, SDO, and XSD.
I'm curious what wuold make this more useful. Eclipse has a testUpdates
site for integration builds, but as of today, we're only doing point
release updates for EMF/XSD/SDO, which means 2.0.0. Would people find
use/benefit in having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603, for example?
To play with the EMF/XSD/SDO 2.0 update manager site (for Eclipse 3.0,
natch), go here, and read the instructions on that page; or, simply
point your update manager at the following site and you can grab the
most recent version of EMF, SDO, or XSD that way. Should be current as
of about 2pm today.
http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/
Thanks,
Nick Boldt
codeslave(at)ca(dot)ibm(dot)com
G. Doney wrote:
> Arun,
>
> Good idea. I’ve added it to both the EMF and XSD FAQs. Thanks for
> the suggestion.
>
> --Gary
>
> Arun Goyal wrote:
>
>
>>Thanks for the response.
>>It might be worth adding to the FAQ to save others some cycles.
>
>
>>Thanks,
>>Arun
>
>
>>"G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>news:bkdfme$js9$1@eclipse.org...
>>
>>>Hi Arun,
>>>
>>>There is no eclipse Update Manager site available yet for EMF. I don't
>>>know about the other eclipse tools subprojects. You might try posting to
>>>the forums for the other tools that you are interested in to see if there
>>>are sites for them.
>>>
>>>--Gary
>>>
>>>Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Yes....a site that works with the eclipse Update Manager.
>>>>I currently have http://update.eclipse.org/updates/ set-up for Eclipse
>>>>updates.
>>>>Although it does not seem to work with EMF or the other tools projects
>>
>>and
>>
>>>>I don't see them listed under th Eclipse SDK 2.1.1 folder.
>>>>Just like CVS I was wondering if there is another URL for the Tools
>>
>>Project
>>
>>>>plug-ins.
>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Arun.
>>>
>>>>"G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:bkavqu$a7t$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>
>>>>>Hi Arun,
>>>>>
>>>>>Just to clarify...are you asking about a site that works with the
>>
>>Eclipse
>>
>>>>>Update Manager?
>>>>>
>>>>>--Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>>I was wondering if there is a EMF update site....the default eclipse
>>>>
>>>>update
>>>>
>>>>>>doesn't
>>>>>>seem to pick up new updates for EMF.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>>Arun
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>
|
|
|
Re: EMF, SDO & XSD Update Site (was Re: EMF Update Site) [message #42851 is a reply to message #42634] |
Thu, 29 April 2004 20:10 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: kutter.a4m.biz
Hi, Nick.
Yes, I would find a having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603
for the latest release useful.
Best, Philipp
Nick Boldt wrote:
> Okay, so this is a really old thread, but as of today I've got the first
> iteration of an Update Manager-capable site for updating EMF, SDO, and XSD.
> I'm curious what wuold make this more useful. Eclipse has a testUpdates
> site for integration builds, but as of today, we're only doing point
> release updates for EMF/XSD/SDO, which means 2.0.0. Would people find
> use/benefit in having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603, for example?
> To play with the EMF/XSD/SDO 2.0 update manager site (for Eclipse 3.0,
> natch), go here, and read the instructions on that page; or, simply
> point your update manager at the following site and you can grab the
> most recent version of EMF, SDO, or XSD that way. Should be current as
> of about 2pm today.
> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/
> Thanks,
> Nick Boldt
> codeslave(at)ca(dot)ibm(dot)com
> G. Doney wrote:
> > Arun,
> >
> > Good idea. Ive added it to both the EMF and XSD FAQs. Thanks for
> > the suggestion.
> >
> > --Gary
> >
> > Arun Goyal wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Thanks for the response.
> >>It might be worth adding to the FAQ to save others some cycles.
> >
> >
> >>Thanks,
> >>Arun
> >
> >
> >>"G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
> >>news:bkdfme$js9$1@eclipse.org...
> >>
> >>>Hi Arun,
> >>>
> >>>There is no eclipse Update Manager site available yet for EMF. I don't
> >>>know about the other eclipse tools subprojects. You might try posting to
> >>>the forums for the other tools that you are interested in to see if there
> >>>are sites for them.
> >>>
> >>>--Gary
> >>>
> >>>Arun Goyal wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Yes....a site that works with the eclipse Update Manager.
> >>>>I currently have http://update.eclipse.org/updates/ set-up for Eclipse
> >>>>updates.
> >>>>Although it does not seem to work with EMF or the other tools projects
> >>
> >>and
> >>
> >>>>I don't see them listed under th Eclipse SDK 2.1.1 folder.
> >>>>Just like CVS I was wondering if there is another URL for the Tools
> >>
> >>Project
> >>
> >>>>plug-ins.
> >>>
> >>>>Thanks,
> >>>>Arun.
> >>>
> >>>>"G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:bkavqu$a7t$1@eclipse.org...
> >>>>
> >>>>>Hi Arun,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Just to clarify...are you asking about a site that works with the
> >>
> >>Eclipse
> >>
> >>>>>Update Manager?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--Gary
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Arun Goyal wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>I was wondering if there is a EMF update site....the default eclipse
> >>>>
> >>>>update
> >>>>
> >>>>>>doesn't
> >>>>>>seem to pick up new updates for EMF.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Thanks,
> >>>>>>Arun
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >
> >
|
|
|
Re: EMF, SDO & XSD Update Site (was Re: EMF Update Site) [message #43280 is a reply to message #42851] |
Mon, 03 May 2004 18:53 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: codeslave.ca.ibm.com
Okay, I'll try to start posting to our UM site
(http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/) with the same frequency
as the posts to http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/scripts/downloads.php
Actually, I'll probably end up trying to script this into our build
process. (Why do something more than 2-3 times when you can automate it
and never have to do it again?) ;-)
Anyone have any insight into building UM jars via script (as opposed to
the site.xml editor within eclipse) ? Any help on this would definitely
make the work effort easier and more likely to happen faster. Heh.
One caveat is that I'm not sure how many places the code needs to be
updated to have this work. Does anyone know if it's just the filenames
on the jars that UM looks for? Or does it read into those jars and check
something like feature.xml, perhaps? If it's just the jars it would be
easier to automate - renaming files is easy. If it's INSIDE the jars,
then I need to ensure these changes are checked back into CVS, etc.,
which while not being significantly harder, does make the dev/test
process somewhat longer.
Thanks in advance,
Nick
Philipp W. Kutter wrote:
> Hi, Nick.
>
> Yes, I would find a having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603
> for the latest release useful.
>
> Best, Philipp
>
>
>
> Nick Boldt wrote:
>
>
>>Okay, so this is a really old thread, but as of today I've got the first
>>iteration of an Update Manager-capable site for updating EMF, SDO, and XSD.
>
>
>>I'm curious what wuold make this more useful. Eclipse has a testUpdates
>>site for integration builds, but as of today, we're only doing point
>>release updates for EMF/XSD/SDO, which means 2.0.0. Would people find
>>use/benefit in having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603, for example?
>
>
>>To play with the EMF/XSD/SDO 2.0 update manager site (for Eclipse 3.0,
>>natch), go here, and read the instructions on that page; or, simply
>>point your update manager at the following site and you can grab the
>>most recent version of EMF, SDO, or XSD that way. Should be current as
>>of about 2pm today.
>
>
>>http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/
>
>
>>Thanks,
>
>
>>Nick Boldt
>>codeslave(at)ca(dot)ibm(dot)com
>
>
>
>>G. Doney wrote:
>>
>>>Arun,
>>>
>>>Good idea. I?ve added it to both the EMF and XSD FAQs. Thanks for
>>>the suggestion.
>>>
>>>--Gary
>>>
>>>Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Thanks for the response.
>>>>It might be worth adding to the FAQ to save others some cycles.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Arun
>>>
>>>
>>>>"G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:bkdfme$js9$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hi Arun,
>>>>>
>>>>>There is no eclipse Update Manager site available yet for EMF. I don't
>>>>>know about the other eclipse tools subprojects. You might try posting to
>>>>>the forums for the other tools that you are interested in to see if there
>>>>>are sites for them.
>>>>>
>>>>>--Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes....a site that works with the eclipse Update Manager.
>>>>>>I currently have http://update.eclipse.org/updates/ set-up for Eclipse
>>>>>>updates.
>>>>>>Although it does not seem to work with EMF or the other tools projects
>>>>
>>>>and
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>I don't see them listed under th Eclipse SDK 2.1.1 folder.
>>>>>>Just like CVS I was wondering if there is another URL for the Tools
>>>>
>>>>Project
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>plug-ins.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>>Arun.
>>>>>
>>>>>>"G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:bkavqu$a7t$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hi Arun,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Just to clarify...are you asking about a site that works with the
>>>>
>>>>Eclipse
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>Update Manager?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>--Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I was wondering if there is a EMF update site....the default eclipse
>>>>>>
>>>>>>update
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>doesn't
>>>>>>>>seem to pick up new updates for EMF.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>>>>Arun
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>
>
|
|
|
Re: EMF, SDO & XSD Update Site (was Re: EMF Update Site): Dev Status Update [message #44042 is a reply to message #43280] |
Mon, 10 May 2004 18:33 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: codeslave.ca.ibm.com
Update.
Turns out there's more to this UM thing than I'd at first thought
(hoped?), but I've managed to establish all the places where versioning
is encoded in plugins.
I'd hoped that jars could simply be renamed from foo_2.0.0.jar to
foo_2.0.0.20040506.jar, and while that works (assuming that site.xml is
updated equivalently) what it doesn't do is allow eclipse w/ emf 2.0.0
installed to be updated to 2.0.0.x, since when UM reads those jars, it
finds 2.0.0, not 2.0.0.yyyymmdd. So, feature.xml & plugin.xml has to be
updated everywhere in order to do the build & have the jars contain the
right info.
Anyway, the upshot is that I'm going to try to get my hands on the Ant
task that Eclipse 3.0 uses to drop builds to updates.eclipse.org, and
use that to get us moving along with UM compliance.
I've also posted a new UM build onto
http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/ - dated May 8, 2am. If
EMF, SDO, or XSD are already installed you have to remove it/them or UM
will think that this version of 2.0.0 is the same as the one you already
have, regardless of timestamps.
Thanks for your patience. Just out of curiosity... how many people will
actually use this feature? If you're one of them, please reply to this
thread.
Thanks,
Nick Boldt
codeslave^ca!ibm!com
Nick Boldt wrote:
> Okay, I'll try to start posting to our UM site
> (http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/) with the same frequency
> as the posts to http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/scripts/downloads.php
>
> Actually, I'll probably end up trying to script this into our build
> process. (Why do something more than 2-3 times when you can automate it
> and never have to do it again?) ;-)
>
> Anyone have any insight into building UM jars via script (as opposed to
> the site.xml editor within eclipse) ? Any help on this would definitely
> make the work effort easier and more likely to happen faster. Heh.
>
> One caveat is that I'm not sure how many places the code needs to be
> updated to have this work. Does anyone know if it's just the filenames
> on the jars that UM looks for? Or does it read into those jars and check
> something like feature.xml, perhaps? If it's just the jars it would be
> easier to automate - renaming files is easy. If it's INSIDE the jars,
> then I need to ensure these changes are checked back into CVS, etc.,
> which while not being significantly harder, does make the dev/test
> process somewhat longer.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Nick
>
>
> Philipp W. Kutter wrote:
>
>> Hi, Nick.
>>
>> Yes, I would find a having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603
>> for the latest release useful.
>>
>> Best, Philipp
>>
>>
>>
>> Nick Boldt wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Okay, so this is a really old thread, but as of today I've got the
>>> first iteration of an Update Manager-capable site for updating EMF,
>>> SDO, and XSD.
>>
>>
>>
>>> I'm curious what wuold make this more useful. Eclipse has a
>>> testUpdates site for integration builds, but as of today, we're only
>>> doing point release updates for EMF/XSD/SDO, which means 2.0.0. Would
>>> people find use/benefit in having an update site with
>>> 2.0.0.200404281603, for example?
>>
>>
>>
>>> To play with the EMF/XSD/SDO 2.0 update manager site (for Eclipse
>>> 3.0, natch), go here, and read the instructions on that page; or,
>>> simply point your update manager at the following site and you can
>>> grab the most recent version of EMF, SDO, or XSD that way. Should be
>>> current as of about 2pm today.
>>
>>
>>
>>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/
>>
>>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>>> Nick Boldt
>>> codeslave(at)ca(dot)ibm(dot)com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> G. Doney wrote:
>>>
>>>> Arun,
>>>>
>>>> Good idea. I?ve added it to both the EMF and XSD FAQs. Thanks for
>>>> the suggestion.
>>>>
>>>> --Gary
>>>>
>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the response.
>>>>> It might be worth adding to the FAQ to save others some cycles.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Arun
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:bkdfme$js9$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Arun,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no eclipse Update Manager site available yet for EMF. I
>>>>>> don't
>>>>>> know about the other eclipse tools subprojects. You might try
>>>>>> posting to
>>>>>> the forums for the other tools that you are interested in to see
>>>>>> if there
>>>>>> are sites for them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes....a site that works with the eclipse Update Manager.
>>>>>>> I currently have http://update.eclipse.org/updates/ set-up for
>>>>>>> Eclipse
>>>>>>> updates.
>>>>>>> Although it does not seem to work with EMF or the other tools
>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't see them listed under th Eclipse SDK 2.1.1 folder.
>>>>>>> Just like CVS I was wondering if there is another URL for the Tools
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Project
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> plug-ins.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Arun.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:bkavqu$a7t$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Arun,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just to clarify...are you asking about a site that works with the
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Eclipse
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Update Manager?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I was wondering if there is a EMF update site....the default
>>>>>>>>> eclipse
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>> seem to pick up new updates for EMF.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Arun
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
|
|
|
Re: EMF, SDO & XSD Update Site (was Re: EMF Update Site): Dev Status Update [message #44474 is a reply to message #44042] |
Thu, 13 May 2004 13:22 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: Jim.Steel.irisa.fr
I will.
Nick Boldt wrote:
> Update.
>
> Turns out there's more to this UM thing than I'd at first thought
> (hoped?), but I've managed to establish all the places where versioning
> is encoded in plugins.
>
> I'd hoped that jars could simply be renamed from foo_2.0.0.jar to
> foo_2.0.0.20040506.jar, and while that works (assuming that site.xml is
> updated equivalently) what it doesn't do is allow eclipse w/ emf 2.0.0
> installed to be updated to 2.0.0.x, since when UM reads those jars, it
> finds 2.0.0, not 2.0.0.yyyymmdd. So, feature.xml & plugin.xml has to be
> updated everywhere in order to do the build & have the jars contain the
> right info.
>
> Anyway, the upshot is that I'm going to try to get my hands on the Ant
> task that Eclipse 3.0 uses to drop builds to updates.eclipse.org, and
> use that to get us moving along with UM compliance.
>
> I've also posted a new UM build onto
> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/ - dated May 8, 2am. If
> EMF, SDO, or XSD are already installed you have to remove it/them or UM
> will think that this version of 2.0.0 is the same as the one you already
> have, regardless of timestamps.
>
> Thanks for your patience. Just out of curiosity... how many people will
> actually use this feature? If you're one of them, please reply to this
> thread.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick Boldt
> codeslave^ca!ibm!com
>
> Nick Boldt wrote:
>
>> Okay, I'll try to start posting to our UM site
>> (http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/) with the same
>> frequency as the posts to
>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/scripts/downloads.php
>>
>> Actually, I'll probably end up trying to script this into our build
>> process. (Why do something more than 2-3 times when you can automate
>> it and never have to do it again?) ;-)
>>
>> Anyone have any insight into building UM jars via script (as opposed
>> to the site.xml editor within eclipse) ? Any help on this would
>> definitely make the work effort easier and more likely to happen
>> faster. Heh.
>>
>> One caveat is that I'm not sure how many places the code needs to be
>> updated to have this work. Does anyone know if it's just the filenames
>> on the jars that UM looks for? Or does it read into those jars and
>> check something like feature.xml, perhaps? If it's just the jars it
>> would be easier to automate - renaming files is easy. If it's INSIDE
>> the jars, then I need to ensure these changes are checked back into
>> CVS, etc., which while not being significantly harder, does make the
>> dev/test process somewhat longer.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>
>> Philipp W. Kutter wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Nick.
>>>
>>> Yes, I would find a having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603
>>> for the latest release useful.
>>>
>>> Best, Philipp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Okay, so this is a really old thread, but as of today I've got the
>>>> first iteration of an Update Manager-capable site for updating EMF,
>>>> SDO, and XSD.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I'm curious what wuold make this more useful. Eclipse has a
>>>> testUpdates site for integration builds, but as of today, we're only
>>>> doing point release updates for EMF/XSD/SDO, which means 2.0.0.
>>>> Would people find use/benefit in having an update site with
>>>> 2.0.0.200404281603, for example?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> To play with the EMF/XSD/SDO 2.0 update manager site (for Eclipse
>>>> 3.0, natch), go here, and read the instructions on that page; or,
>>>> simply point your update manager at the following site and you can
>>>> grab the most recent version of EMF, SDO, or XSD that way. Should be
>>>> current as of about 2pm today.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Nick Boldt
>>>> codeslave(at)ca(dot)ibm(dot)com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> G. Doney wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Arun,
>>>>>
>>>>> Good idea. I?ve added it to both the EMF and XSD FAQs. Thanks for
>>>>> the suggestion.
>>>>>
>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>
>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the response.
>>>>>> It might be worth adding to the FAQ to save others some cycles.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Arun
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:bkdfme$js9$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Arun,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no eclipse Update Manager site available yet for EMF. I
>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>> know about the other eclipse tools subprojects. You might try
>>>>>>> posting to
>>>>>>> the forums for the other tools that you are interested in to see
>>>>>>> if there
>>>>>>> are sites for them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes....a site that works with the eclipse Update Manager.
>>>>>>>> I currently have http://update.eclipse.org/updates/ set-up for
>>>>>>>> Eclipse
>>>>>>>> updates.
>>>>>>>> Although it does not seem to work with EMF or the other tools
>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't see them listed under th Eclipse SDK 2.1.1 folder.
>>>>>>>> Just like CVS I was wondering if there is another URL for the Tools
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Project
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> plug-ins.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Arun.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:bkavqu$a7t$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Arun,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just to clarify...are you asking about a site that works with the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eclipse
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Update Manager?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I was wondering if there is a EMF update site....the default
>>>>>>>>>> eclipse
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>> seem to pick up new updates for EMF.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Arun
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
|
|
|
Re: EMF, SDO & XSD Update Site (was Re: EMF Update Site): Dev Status Update [message #44564 is a reply to message #44474] |
Sun, 16 May 2004 01:55 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: eoinlane.us.ibm.com
+1
Jim Steel wrote:
>
> I will.
>
>
> Nick Boldt wrote:
>
>> Update.
>>
>> Turns out there's more to this UM thing than I'd at first thought
>> (hoped?), but I've managed to establish all the places where
>> versioning is encoded in plugins.
>>
>> I'd hoped that jars could simply be renamed from foo_2.0.0.jar to
>> foo_2.0.0.20040506.jar, and while that works (assuming that site.xml
>> is updated equivalently) what it doesn't do is allow eclipse w/ emf
>> 2.0.0 installed to be updated to 2.0.0.x, since when UM reads those
>> jars, it finds 2.0.0, not 2.0.0.yyyymmdd. So, feature.xml & plugin.xml
>> has to be updated everywhere in order to do the build & have the jars
>> contain the right info.
>>
>> Anyway, the upshot is that I'm going to try to get my hands on the Ant
>> task that Eclipse 3.0 uses to drop builds to updates.eclipse.org, and
>> use that to get us moving along with UM compliance.
>>
>> I've also posted a new UM build onto
>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/ - dated May 8, 2am. If
>> EMF, SDO, or XSD are already installed you have to remove it/them or
>> UM will think that this version of 2.0.0 is the same as the one you
>> already have, regardless of timestamps.
>>
>> Thanks for your patience. Just out of curiosity... how many people
>> will actually use this feature? If you're one of them, please reply to
>> this thread.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Nick Boldt
>> codeslave^ca!ibm!com
>>
>> Nick Boldt wrote:
>>
>>> Okay, I'll try to start posting to our UM site
>>> (http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/) with the same
>>> frequency as the posts to
>>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/scripts/downloads.php
>>>
>>> Actually, I'll probably end up trying to script this into our build
>>> process. (Why do something more than 2-3 times when you can automate
>>> it and never have to do it again?) ;-)
>>>
>>> Anyone have any insight into building UM jars via script (as opposed
>>> to the site.xml editor within eclipse) ? Any help on this would
>>> definitely make the work effort easier and more likely to happen
>>> faster. Heh.
>>>
>>> One caveat is that I'm not sure how many places the code needs to be
>>> updated to have this work. Does anyone know if it's just the
>>> filenames on the jars that UM looks for? Or does it read into those
>>> jars and check something like feature.xml, perhaps? If it's just the
>>> jars it would be easier to automate - renaming files is easy. If it's
>>> INSIDE the jars, then I need to ensure these changes are checked back
>>> into CVS, etc., which while not being significantly harder, does make
>>> the dev/test process somewhat longer.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>>
>>> Philipp W. Kutter wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, Nick.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I would find a having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603
>>>> for the latest release useful.
>>>>
>>>> Best, Philipp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Okay, so this is a really old thread, but as of today I've got the
>>>>> first iteration of an Update Manager-capable site for updating EMF,
>>>>> SDO, and XSD.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I'm curious what wuold make this more useful. Eclipse has a
>>>>> testUpdates site for integration builds, but as of today, we're
>>>>> only doing point release updates for EMF/XSD/SDO, which means
>>>>> 2.0.0. Would people find use/benefit in having an update site with
>>>>> 2.0.0.200404281603, for example?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> To play with the EMF/XSD/SDO 2.0 update manager site (for Eclipse
>>>>> 3.0, natch), go here, and read the instructions on that page; or,
>>>>> simply point your update manager at the following site and you can
>>>>> grab the most recent version of EMF, SDO, or XSD that way. Should
>>>>> be current as of about 2pm today.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Nick Boldt
>>>>> codeslave(at)ca(dot)ibm(dot)com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> G. Doney wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Arun,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good idea. I?ve added it to both the EMF and XSD FAQs. Thanks for
>>>>>> the suggestion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for the response.
>>>>>>> It might be worth adding to the FAQ to save others some cycles.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Arun
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:bkdfme$js9$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Arun,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no eclipse Update Manager site available yet for EMF.
>>>>>>>> I don't
>>>>>>>> know about the other eclipse tools subprojects. You might try
>>>>>>>> posting to
>>>>>>>> the forums for the other tools that you are interested in to see
>>>>>>>> if there
>>>>>>>> are sites for them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes....a site that works with the eclipse Update Manager.
>>>>>>>>> I currently have http://update.eclipse.org/updates/ set-up for
>>>>>>>>> Eclipse
>>>>>>>>> updates.
>>>>>>>>> Although it does not seem to work with EMF or the other tools
>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't see them listed under th Eclipse SDK 2.1.1 folder.
>>>>>>>>> Just like CVS I was wondering if there is another URL for the
>>>>>>>>> Tools
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Project
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> plug-ins.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Arun.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:bkavqu$a7t$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Arun,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just to clarify...are you asking about a site that works with the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Eclipse
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Update Manager?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I was wondering if there is a EMF update site....the default
>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>> seem to pick up new updates for EMF.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Arun
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
|
|
|
Re: EMF, SDO & XSD Update Site (was Re: EMF Update Site): Dev Status Update [message #45256 is a reply to message #44564] |
Mon, 24 May 2004 03:46 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: eoin.eoinlane.com
Just wanted to let u know that the update site seems to currently be
failing.
I got the following error:
Unable to complete action for feature "Eclipse Modeling Framework" due
to errors.
The File
" /tmp/-1805888527/eclipse/.update/1085370166067/1085370166068 /eclipse18205.tmp "
is not a valid JAR file. [invalid END header (bad central directory offset)]
Eoin Lane wrote:
> +1
> Jim Steel wrote:
>
>>
>> I will.
>>
>>
>> Nick Boldt wrote:
>>
>>> Update.
>>>
>>> Turns out there's more to this UM thing than I'd at first thought
>>> (hoped?), but I've managed to establish all the places where
>>> versioning is encoded in plugins.
>>>
>>> I'd hoped that jars could simply be renamed from foo_2.0.0.jar to
>>> foo_2.0.0.20040506.jar, and while that works (assuming that site.xml
>>> is updated equivalently) what it doesn't do is allow eclipse w/ emf
>>> 2.0.0 installed to be updated to 2.0.0.x, since when UM reads those
>>> jars, it finds 2.0.0, not 2.0.0.yyyymmdd. So, feature.xml &
>>> plugin.xml has to be updated everywhere in order to do the build &
>>> have the jars contain the right info.
>>>
>>> Anyway, the upshot is that I'm going to try to get my hands on the
>>> Ant task that Eclipse 3.0 uses to drop builds to updates.eclipse.org,
>>> and use that to get us moving along with UM compliance.
>>>
>>> I've also posted a new UM build onto
>>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/ - dated May 8, 2am. If
>>> EMF, SDO, or XSD are already installed you have to remove it/them or
>>> UM will think that this version of 2.0.0 is the same as the one you
>>> already have, regardless of timestamps.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your patience. Just out of curiosity... how many people
>>> will actually use this feature? If you're one of them, please reply
>>> to this thread.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Nick Boldt
>>> codeslave^ca!ibm!com
>>>
>>> Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>
>>>> Okay, I'll try to start posting to our UM site
>>>> (http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/) with the same
>>>> frequency as the posts to
>>>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/scripts/downloads.php
>>>>
>>>> Actually, I'll probably end up trying to script this into our build
>>>> process. (Why do something more than 2-3 times when you can automate
>>>> it and never have to do it again?) ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Anyone have any insight into building UM jars via script (as opposed
>>>> to the site.xml editor within eclipse) ? Any help on this would
>>>> definitely make the work effort easier and more likely to happen
>>>> faster. Heh.
>>>>
>>>> One caveat is that I'm not sure how many places the code needs to be
>>>> updated to have this work. Does anyone know if it's just the
>>>> filenames on the jars that UM looks for? Or does it read into those
>>>> jars and check something like feature.xml, perhaps? If it's just the
>>>> jars it would be easier to automate - renaming files is easy. If
>>>> it's INSIDE the jars, then I need to ensure these changes are
>>>> checked back into CVS, etc., which while not being significantly
>>>> harder, does make the dev/test process somewhat longer.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>
>>>> Nick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Philipp W. Kutter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, Nick.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I would find a having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603
>>>>> for the latest release useful.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best, Philipp
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay, so this is a really old thread, but as of today I've got the
>>>>>> first iteration of an Update Manager-capable site for updating
>>>>>> EMF, SDO, and XSD.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm curious what wuold make this more useful. Eclipse has a
>>>>>> testUpdates site for integration builds, but as of today, we're
>>>>>> only doing point release updates for EMF/XSD/SDO, which means
>>>>>> 2.0.0. Would people find use/benefit in having an update site with
>>>>>> 2.0.0.200404281603, for example?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> To play with the EMF/XSD/SDO 2.0 update manager site (for Eclipse
>>>>>> 3.0, natch), go here, and read the instructions on that page; or,
>>>>>> simply point your update manager at the following site and you can
>>>>>> grab the most recent version of EMF, SDO, or XSD that way. Should
>>>>>> be current as of about 2pm today.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nick Boldt
>>>>>> codeslave(at)ca(dot)ibm(dot)com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> G. Doney wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Arun,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good idea. I?ve added it to both the EMF and XSD FAQs. Thanks for
>>>>>>> the suggestion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the response.
>>>>>>>> It might be worth adding to the FAQ to save others some cycles.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Arun
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:bkdfme$js9$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Arun,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is no eclipse Update Manager site available yet for EMF.
>>>>>>>>> I don't
>>>>>>>>> know about the other eclipse tools subprojects. You might try
>>>>>>>>> posting to
>>>>>>>>> the forums for the other tools that you are interested in to
>>>>>>>>> see if there
>>>>>>>>> are sites for them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes....a site that works with the eclipse Update Manager.
>>>>>>>>>> I currently have http://update.eclipse.org/updates/ set-up for
>>>>>>>>>> Eclipse
>>>>>>>>>> updates.
>>>>>>>>>> Although it does not seem to work with EMF or the other tools
>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't see them listed under th Eclipse SDK 2.1.1 folder.
>>>>>>>>>> Just like CVS I was wondering if there is another URL for the
>>>>>>>>>> Tools
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Project
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> plug-ins.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Arun.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:bkavqu$a7t$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Arun,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Just to clarify...are you asking about a site that works with
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Eclipse
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Update Manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I was wondering if there is a EMF update site....the default
>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>> seem to pick up new updates for EMF.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Arun
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
|
|
| |
Re: EMF, SDO & XSD Update Site (was Re: EMF Update Site) [message #586351 is a reply to message #42634] |
Thu, 29 April 2004 20:10 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: kutter.a4m.biz
Hi, Nick.
Yes, I would find a having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603
for the latest release useful.
Best, Philipp
Nick Boldt wrote:
> Okay, so this is a really old thread, but as of today I've got the first
> iteration of an Update Manager-capable site for updating EMF, SDO, and XSD.
> I'm curious what wuold make this more useful. Eclipse has a testUpdates
> site for integration builds, but as of today, we're only doing point
> release updates for EMF/XSD/SDO, which means 2.0.0. Would people find
> use/benefit in having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603, for example?
> To play with the EMF/XSD/SDO 2.0 update manager site (for Eclipse 3.0,
> natch), go here, and read the instructions on that page; or, simply
> point your update manager at the following site and you can grab the
> most recent version of EMF, SDO, or XSD that way. Should be current as
> of about 2pm today.
> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/
> Thanks,
> Nick Boldt
> codeslave(at)ca(dot)ibm(dot)com
> G. Doney wrote:
> > Arun,
> >
> > Good idea. Ive added it to both the EMF and XSD FAQs. Thanks for
> > the suggestion.
> >
> > --Gary
> >
> > Arun Goyal wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Thanks for the response.
> >>It might be worth adding to the FAQ to save others some cycles.
> >
> >
> >>Thanks,
> >>Arun
> >
> >
> >>"G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
> >>news:bkdfme$js9$1@eclipse.org...
> >>
> >>>Hi Arun,
> >>>
> >>>There is no eclipse Update Manager site available yet for EMF. I don't
> >>>know about the other eclipse tools subprojects. You might try posting to
> >>>the forums for the other tools that you are interested in to see if there
> >>>are sites for them.
> >>>
> >>>--Gary
> >>>
> >>>Arun Goyal wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Yes....a site that works with the eclipse Update Manager.
> >>>>I currently have http://update.eclipse.org/updates/ set-up for Eclipse
> >>>>updates.
> >>>>Although it does not seem to work with EMF or the other tools projects
> >>
> >>and
> >>
> >>>>I don't see them listed under th Eclipse SDK 2.1.1 folder.
> >>>>Just like CVS I was wondering if there is another URL for the Tools
> >>
> >>Project
> >>
> >>>>plug-ins.
> >>>
> >>>>Thanks,
> >>>>Arun.
> >>>
> >>>>"G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:bkavqu$a7t$1@eclipse.org...
> >>>>
> >>>>>Hi Arun,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Just to clarify...are you asking about a site that works with the
> >>
> >>Eclipse
> >>
> >>>>>Update Manager?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--Gary
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Arun Goyal wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>I was wondering if there is a EMF update site....the default eclipse
> >>>>
> >>>>update
> >>>>
> >>>>>>doesn't
> >>>>>>seem to pick up new updates for EMF.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Thanks,
> >>>>>>Arun
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >
> >
|
|
|
Re: EMF, SDO & XSD Update Site (was Re: EMF Update Site) [message #586561 is a reply to message #42851] |
Mon, 03 May 2004 18:53 |
Nick Boldt Messages: 481 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Okay, I'll try to start posting to our UM site
(http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/) with the same frequency
as the posts to http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/scripts/downloads.php
Actually, I'll probably end up trying to script this into our build
process. (Why do something more than 2-3 times when you can automate it
and never have to do it again?) ;-)
Anyone have any insight into building UM jars via script (as opposed to
the site.xml editor within eclipse) ? Any help on this would definitely
make the work effort easier and more likely to happen faster. Heh.
One caveat is that I'm not sure how many places the code needs to be
updated to have this work. Does anyone know if it's just the filenames
on the jars that UM looks for? Or does it read into those jars and check
something like feature.xml, perhaps? If it's just the jars it would be
easier to automate - renaming files is easy. If it's INSIDE the jars,
then I need to ensure these changes are checked back into CVS, etc.,
which while not being significantly harder, does make the dev/test
process somewhat longer.
Thanks in advance,
Nick
Philipp W. Kutter wrote:
> Hi, Nick.
>
> Yes, I would find a having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603
> for the latest release useful.
>
> Best, Philipp
>
>
>
> Nick Boldt wrote:
>
>
>>Okay, so this is a really old thread, but as of today I've got the first
>>iteration of an Update Manager-capable site for updating EMF, SDO, and XSD.
>
>
>>I'm curious what wuold make this more useful. Eclipse has a testUpdates
>>site for integration builds, but as of today, we're only doing point
>>release updates for EMF/XSD/SDO, which means 2.0.0. Would people find
>>use/benefit in having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603, for example?
>
>
>>To play with the EMF/XSD/SDO 2.0 update manager site (for Eclipse 3.0,
>>natch), go here, and read the instructions on that page; or, simply
>>point your update manager at the following site and you can grab the
>>most recent version of EMF, SDO, or XSD that way. Should be current as
>>of about 2pm today.
>
>
>>http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/
>
>
>>Thanks,
>
>
>>Nick Boldt
>>codeslave(at)ca(dot)ibm(dot)com
>
>
>
>>G. Doney wrote:
>>
>>>Arun,
>>>
>>>Good idea. I?ve added it to both the EMF and XSD FAQs. Thanks for
>>>the suggestion.
>>>
>>>--Gary
>>>
>>>Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Thanks for the response.
>>>>It might be worth adding to the FAQ to save others some cycles.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Arun
>>>
>>>
>>>>"G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:bkdfme$js9$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hi Arun,
>>>>>
>>>>>There is no eclipse Update Manager site available yet for EMF. I don't
>>>>>know about the other eclipse tools subprojects. You might try posting to
>>>>>the forums for the other tools that you are interested in to see if there
>>>>>are sites for them.
>>>>>
>>>>>--Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes....a site that works with the eclipse Update Manager.
>>>>>>I currently have http://update.eclipse.org/updates/ set-up for Eclipse
>>>>>>updates.
>>>>>>Although it does not seem to work with EMF or the other tools projects
>>>>
>>>>and
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>I don't see them listed under th Eclipse SDK 2.1.1 folder.
>>>>>>Just like CVS I was wondering if there is another URL for the Tools
>>>>
>>>>Project
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>plug-ins.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>>Arun.
>>>>>
>>>>>>"G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:bkavqu$a7t$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hi Arun,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Just to clarify...are you asking about a site that works with the
>>>>
>>>>Eclipse
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>Update Manager?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>--Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I was wondering if there is a EMF update site....the default eclipse
>>>>>>
>>>>>>update
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>doesn't
>>>>>>>>seem to pick up new updates for EMF.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>>>>Arun
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>
>
|
|
|
Re: EMF, SDO & XSD Update Site (was Re: EMF Update Site): Dev Status Update [message #586892 is a reply to message #43280] |
Mon, 10 May 2004 18:33 |
Nick Boldt Messages: 481 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Update.
Turns out there's more to this UM thing than I'd at first thought
(hoped?), but I've managed to establish all the places where versioning
is encoded in plugins.
I'd hoped that jars could simply be renamed from foo_2.0.0.jar to
foo_2.0.0.20040506.jar, and while that works (assuming that site.xml is
updated equivalently) what it doesn't do is allow eclipse w/ emf 2.0.0
installed to be updated to 2.0.0.x, since when UM reads those jars, it
finds 2.0.0, not 2.0.0.yyyymmdd. So, feature.xml & plugin.xml has to be
updated everywhere in order to do the build & have the jars contain the
right info.
Anyway, the upshot is that I'm going to try to get my hands on the Ant
task that Eclipse 3.0 uses to drop builds to updates.eclipse.org, and
use that to get us moving along with UM compliance.
I've also posted a new UM build onto
http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/ - dated May 8, 2am. If
EMF, SDO, or XSD are already installed you have to remove it/them or UM
will think that this version of 2.0.0 is the same as the one you already
have, regardless of timestamps.
Thanks for your patience. Just out of curiosity... how many people will
actually use this feature? If you're one of them, please reply to this
thread.
Thanks,
Nick Boldt
codeslave^ca!ibm!com
Nick Boldt wrote:
> Okay, I'll try to start posting to our UM site
> (http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/) with the same frequency
> as the posts to http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/scripts/downloads.php
>
> Actually, I'll probably end up trying to script this into our build
> process. (Why do something more than 2-3 times when you can automate it
> and never have to do it again?) ;-)
>
> Anyone have any insight into building UM jars via script (as opposed to
> the site.xml editor within eclipse) ? Any help on this would definitely
> make the work effort easier and more likely to happen faster. Heh.
>
> One caveat is that I'm not sure how many places the code needs to be
> updated to have this work. Does anyone know if it's just the filenames
> on the jars that UM looks for? Or does it read into those jars and check
> something like feature.xml, perhaps? If it's just the jars it would be
> easier to automate - renaming files is easy. If it's INSIDE the jars,
> then I need to ensure these changes are checked back into CVS, etc.,
> which while not being significantly harder, does make the dev/test
> process somewhat longer.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Nick
>
>
> Philipp W. Kutter wrote:
>
>> Hi, Nick.
>>
>> Yes, I would find a having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603
>> for the latest release useful.
>>
>> Best, Philipp
>>
>>
>>
>> Nick Boldt wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Okay, so this is a really old thread, but as of today I've got the
>>> first iteration of an Update Manager-capable site for updating EMF,
>>> SDO, and XSD.
>>
>>
>>
>>> I'm curious what wuold make this more useful. Eclipse has a
>>> testUpdates site for integration builds, but as of today, we're only
>>> doing point release updates for EMF/XSD/SDO, which means 2.0.0. Would
>>> people find use/benefit in having an update site with
>>> 2.0.0.200404281603, for example?
>>
>>
>>
>>> To play with the EMF/XSD/SDO 2.0 update manager site (for Eclipse
>>> 3.0, natch), go here, and read the instructions on that page; or,
>>> simply point your update manager at the following site and you can
>>> grab the most recent version of EMF, SDO, or XSD that way. Should be
>>> current as of about 2pm today.
>>
>>
>>
>>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/
>>
>>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>>> Nick Boldt
>>> codeslave(at)ca(dot)ibm(dot)com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> G. Doney wrote:
>>>
>>>> Arun,
>>>>
>>>> Good idea. I?ve added it to both the EMF and XSD FAQs. Thanks for
>>>> the suggestion.
>>>>
>>>> --Gary
>>>>
>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the response.
>>>>> It might be worth adding to the FAQ to save others some cycles.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Arun
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:bkdfme$js9$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Arun,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no eclipse Update Manager site available yet for EMF. I
>>>>>> don't
>>>>>> know about the other eclipse tools subprojects. You might try
>>>>>> posting to
>>>>>> the forums for the other tools that you are interested in to see
>>>>>> if there
>>>>>> are sites for them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes....a site that works with the eclipse Update Manager.
>>>>>>> I currently have http://update.eclipse.org/updates/ set-up for
>>>>>>> Eclipse
>>>>>>> updates.
>>>>>>> Although it does not seem to work with EMF or the other tools
>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't see them listed under th Eclipse SDK 2.1.1 folder.
>>>>>>> Just like CVS I was wondering if there is another URL for the Tools
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Project
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> plug-ins.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Arun.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:bkavqu$a7t$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Arun,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just to clarify...are you asking about a site that works with the
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Eclipse
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Update Manager?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I was wondering if there is a EMF update site....the default
>>>>>>>>> eclipse
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>> seem to pick up new updates for EMF.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Arun
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
|
|
|
Re: EMF, SDO & XSD Update Site (was Re: EMF Update Site): Dev Status Update [message #587092 is a reply to message #44042] |
Thu, 13 May 2004 13:22 |
Jim Steel Messages: 54 Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
I will.
Nick Boldt wrote:
> Update.
>
> Turns out there's more to this UM thing than I'd at first thought
> (hoped?), but I've managed to establish all the places where versioning
> is encoded in plugins.
>
> I'd hoped that jars could simply be renamed from foo_2.0.0.jar to
> foo_2.0.0.20040506.jar, and while that works (assuming that site.xml is
> updated equivalently) what it doesn't do is allow eclipse w/ emf 2.0.0
> installed to be updated to 2.0.0.x, since when UM reads those jars, it
> finds 2.0.0, not 2.0.0.yyyymmdd. So, feature.xml & plugin.xml has to be
> updated everywhere in order to do the build & have the jars contain the
> right info.
>
> Anyway, the upshot is that I'm going to try to get my hands on the Ant
> task that Eclipse 3.0 uses to drop builds to updates.eclipse.org, and
> use that to get us moving along with UM compliance.
>
> I've also posted a new UM build onto
> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/ - dated May 8, 2am. If
> EMF, SDO, or XSD are already installed you have to remove it/them or UM
> will think that this version of 2.0.0 is the same as the one you already
> have, regardless of timestamps.
>
> Thanks for your patience. Just out of curiosity... how many people will
> actually use this feature? If you're one of them, please reply to this
> thread.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick Boldt
> codeslave^ca!ibm!com
>
> Nick Boldt wrote:
>
>> Okay, I'll try to start posting to our UM site
>> (http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/) with the same
>> frequency as the posts to
>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/scripts/downloads.php
>>
>> Actually, I'll probably end up trying to script this into our build
>> process. (Why do something more than 2-3 times when you can automate
>> it and never have to do it again?) ;-)
>>
>> Anyone have any insight into building UM jars via script (as opposed
>> to the site.xml editor within eclipse) ? Any help on this would
>> definitely make the work effort easier and more likely to happen
>> faster. Heh.
>>
>> One caveat is that I'm not sure how many places the code needs to be
>> updated to have this work. Does anyone know if it's just the filenames
>> on the jars that UM looks for? Or does it read into those jars and
>> check something like feature.xml, perhaps? If it's just the jars it
>> would be easier to automate - renaming files is easy. If it's INSIDE
>> the jars, then I need to ensure these changes are checked back into
>> CVS, etc., which while not being significantly harder, does make the
>> dev/test process somewhat longer.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>
>> Philipp W. Kutter wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Nick.
>>>
>>> Yes, I would find a having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603
>>> for the latest release useful.
>>>
>>> Best, Philipp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Okay, so this is a really old thread, but as of today I've got the
>>>> first iteration of an Update Manager-capable site for updating EMF,
>>>> SDO, and XSD.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I'm curious what wuold make this more useful. Eclipse has a
>>>> testUpdates site for integration builds, but as of today, we're only
>>>> doing point release updates for EMF/XSD/SDO, which means 2.0.0.
>>>> Would people find use/benefit in having an update site with
>>>> 2.0.0.200404281603, for example?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> To play with the EMF/XSD/SDO 2.0 update manager site (for Eclipse
>>>> 3.0, natch), go here, and read the instructions on that page; or,
>>>> simply point your update manager at the following site and you can
>>>> grab the most recent version of EMF, SDO, or XSD that way. Should be
>>>> current as of about 2pm today.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Nick Boldt
>>>> codeslave(at)ca(dot)ibm(dot)com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> G. Doney wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Arun,
>>>>>
>>>>> Good idea. I?ve added it to both the EMF and XSD FAQs. Thanks for
>>>>> the suggestion.
>>>>>
>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>
>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the response.
>>>>>> It might be worth adding to the FAQ to save others some cycles.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Arun
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:bkdfme$js9$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Arun,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no eclipse Update Manager site available yet for EMF. I
>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>> know about the other eclipse tools subprojects. You might try
>>>>>>> posting to
>>>>>>> the forums for the other tools that you are interested in to see
>>>>>>> if there
>>>>>>> are sites for them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes....a site that works with the eclipse Update Manager.
>>>>>>>> I currently have http://update.eclipse.org/updates/ set-up for
>>>>>>>> Eclipse
>>>>>>>> updates.
>>>>>>>> Although it does not seem to work with EMF or the other tools
>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't see them listed under th Eclipse SDK 2.1.1 folder.
>>>>>>>> Just like CVS I was wondering if there is another URL for the Tools
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Project
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> plug-ins.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Arun.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:bkavqu$a7t$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Arun,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just to clarify...are you asking about a site that works with the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eclipse
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Update Manager?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I was wondering if there is a EMF update site....the default
>>>>>>>>>> eclipse
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>> seem to pick up new updates for EMF.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Arun
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
|
|
|
Re: EMF, SDO & XSD Update Site (was Re: EMF Update Site): Dev Status Update [message #587123 is a reply to message #44474] |
Sun, 16 May 2004 01:55 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: eoinlane.us.ibm.com
+1
Jim Steel wrote:
>
> I will.
>
>
> Nick Boldt wrote:
>
>> Update.
>>
>> Turns out there's more to this UM thing than I'd at first thought
>> (hoped?), but I've managed to establish all the places where
>> versioning is encoded in plugins.
>>
>> I'd hoped that jars could simply be renamed from foo_2.0.0.jar to
>> foo_2.0.0.20040506.jar, and while that works (assuming that site.xml
>> is updated equivalently) what it doesn't do is allow eclipse w/ emf
>> 2.0.0 installed to be updated to 2.0.0.x, since when UM reads those
>> jars, it finds 2.0.0, not 2.0.0.yyyymmdd. So, feature.xml & plugin.xml
>> has to be updated everywhere in order to do the build & have the jars
>> contain the right info.
>>
>> Anyway, the upshot is that I'm going to try to get my hands on the Ant
>> task that Eclipse 3.0 uses to drop builds to updates.eclipse.org, and
>> use that to get us moving along with UM compliance.
>>
>> I've also posted a new UM build onto
>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/ - dated May 8, 2am. If
>> EMF, SDO, or XSD are already installed you have to remove it/them or
>> UM will think that this version of 2.0.0 is the same as the one you
>> already have, regardless of timestamps.
>>
>> Thanks for your patience. Just out of curiosity... how many people
>> will actually use this feature? If you're one of them, please reply to
>> this thread.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Nick Boldt
>> codeslave^ca!ibm!com
>>
>> Nick Boldt wrote:
>>
>>> Okay, I'll try to start posting to our UM site
>>> (http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/) with the same
>>> frequency as the posts to
>>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/scripts/downloads.php
>>>
>>> Actually, I'll probably end up trying to script this into our build
>>> process. (Why do something more than 2-3 times when you can automate
>>> it and never have to do it again?) ;-)
>>>
>>> Anyone have any insight into building UM jars via script (as opposed
>>> to the site.xml editor within eclipse) ? Any help on this would
>>> definitely make the work effort easier and more likely to happen
>>> faster. Heh.
>>>
>>> One caveat is that I'm not sure how many places the code needs to be
>>> updated to have this work. Does anyone know if it's just the
>>> filenames on the jars that UM looks for? Or does it read into those
>>> jars and check something like feature.xml, perhaps? If it's just the
>>> jars it would be easier to automate - renaming files is easy. If it's
>>> INSIDE the jars, then I need to ensure these changes are checked back
>>> into CVS, etc., which while not being significantly harder, does make
>>> the dev/test process somewhat longer.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>>
>>> Philipp W. Kutter wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, Nick.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I would find a having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603
>>>> for the latest release useful.
>>>>
>>>> Best, Philipp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Okay, so this is a really old thread, but as of today I've got the
>>>>> first iteration of an Update Manager-capable site for updating EMF,
>>>>> SDO, and XSD.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I'm curious what wuold make this more useful. Eclipse has a
>>>>> testUpdates site for integration builds, but as of today, we're
>>>>> only doing point release updates for EMF/XSD/SDO, which means
>>>>> 2.0.0. Would people find use/benefit in having an update site with
>>>>> 2.0.0.200404281603, for example?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> To play with the EMF/XSD/SDO 2.0 update manager site (for Eclipse
>>>>> 3.0, natch), go here, and read the instructions on that page; or,
>>>>> simply point your update manager at the following site and you can
>>>>> grab the most recent version of EMF, SDO, or XSD that way. Should
>>>>> be current as of about 2pm today.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Nick Boldt
>>>>> codeslave(at)ca(dot)ibm(dot)com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> G. Doney wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Arun,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good idea. I?ve added it to both the EMF and XSD FAQs. Thanks for
>>>>>> the suggestion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for the response.
>>>>>>> It might be worth adding to the FAQ to save others some cycles.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Arun
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:bkdfme$js9$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Arun,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no eclipse Update Manager site available yet for EMF.
>>>>>>>> I don't
>>>>>>>> know about the other eclipse tools subprojects. You might try
>>>>>>>> posting to
>>>>>>>> the forums for the other tools that you are interested in to see
>>>>>>>> if there
>>>>>>>> are sites for them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes....a site that works with the eclipse Update Manager.
>>>>>>>>> I currently have http://update.eclipse.org/updates/ set-up for
>>>>>>>>> Eclipse
>>>>>>>>> updates.
>>>>>>>>> Although it does not seem to work with EMF or the other tools
>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't see them listed under th Eclipse SDK 2.1.1 folder.
>>>>>>>>> Just like CVS I was wondering if there is another URL for the
>>>>>>>>> Tools
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Project
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> plug-ins.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Arun.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:bkavqu$a7t$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Arun,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just to clarify...are you asking about a site that works with the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Eclipse
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Update Manager?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I was wondering if there is a EMF update site....the default
>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>> seem to pick up new updates for EMF.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Arun
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
|
|
|
Re: EMF, SDO & XSD Update Site (was Re: EMF Update Site): Dev Status Update [message #587396 is a reply to message #44564] |
Mon, 24 May 2004 03:46 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: eoin.eoinlane.com
Just wanted to let u know that the update site seems to currently be
failing.
I got the following error:
Unable to complete action for feature "Eclipse Modeling Framework" due
to errors.
The File
" /tmp/-1805888527/eclipse/.update/1085370166067/1085370166068 /eclipse18205.tmp "
is not a valid JAR file. [invalid END header (bad central directory offset)]
Eoin Lane wrote:
> +1
> Jim Steel wrote:
>
>>
>> I will.
>>
>>
>> Nick Boldt wrote:
>>
>>> Update.
>>>
>>> Turns out there's more to this UM thing than I'd at first thought
>>> (hoped?), but I've managed to establish all the places where
>>> versioning is encoded in plugins.
>>>
>>> I'd hoped that jars could simply be renamed from foo_2.0.0.jar to
>>> foo_2.0.0.20040506.jar, and while that works (assuming that site.xml
>>> is updated equivalently) what it doesn't do is allow eclipse w/ emf
>>> 2.0.0 installed to be updated to 2.0.0.x, since when UM reads those
>>> jars, it finds 2.0.0, not 2.0.0.yyyymmdd. So, feature.xml &
>>> plugin.xml has to be updated everywhere in order to do the build &
>>> have the jars contain the right info.
>>>
>>> Anyway, the upshot is that I'm going to try to get my hands on the
>>> Ant task that Eclipse 3.0 uses to drop builds to updates.eclipse.org,
>>> and use that to get us moving along with UM compliance.
>>>
>>> I've also posted a new UM build onto
>>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/ - dated May 8, 2am. If
>>> EMF, SDO, or XSD are already installed you have to remove it/them or
>>> UM will think that this version of 2.0.0 is the same as the one you
>>> already have, regardless of timestamps.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your patience. Just out of curiosity... how many people
>>> will actually use this feature? If you're one of them, please reply
>>> to this thread.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Nick Boldt
>>> codeslave^ca!ibm!com
>>>
>>> Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>
>>>> Okay, I'll try to start posting to our UM site
>>>> (http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/) with the same
>>>> frequency as the posts to
>>>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/scripts/downloads.php
>>>>
>>>> Actually, I'll probably end up trying to script this into our build
>>>> process. (Why do something more than 2-3 times when you can automate
>>>> it and never have to do it again?) ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Anyone have any insight into building UM jars via script (as opposed
>>>> to the site.xml editor within eclipse) ? Any help on this would
>>>> definitely make the work effort easier and more likely to happen
>>>> faster. Heh.
>>>>
>>>> One caveat is that I'm not sure how many places the code needs to be
>>>> updated to have this work. Does anyone know if it's just the
>>>> filenames on the jars that UM looks for? Or does it read into those
>>>> jars and check something like feature.xml, perhaps? If it's just the
>>>> jars it would be easier to automate - renaming files is easy. If
>>>> it's INSIDE the jars, then I need to ensure these changes are
>>>> checked back into CVS, etc., which while not being significantly
>>>> harder, does make the dev/test process somewhat longer.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>
>>>> Nick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Philipp W. Kutter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, Nick.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I would find a having an update site with 2.0.0.200404281603
>>>>> for the latest release useful.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best, Philipp
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay, so this is a really old thread, but as of today I've got the
>>>>>> first iteration of an Update Manager-capable site for updating
>>>>>> EMF, SDO, and XSD.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm curious what wuold make this more useful. Eclipse has a
>>>>>> testUpdates site for integration builds, but as of today, we're
>>>>>> only doing point release updates for EMF/XSD/SDO, which means
>>>>>> 2.0.0. Would people find use/benefit in having an update site with
>>>>>> 2.0.0.200404281603, for example?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> To play with the EMF/XSD/SDO 2.0 update manager site (for Eclipse
>>>>>> 3.0, natch), go here, and read the instructions on that page; or,
>>>>>> simply point your update manager at the following site and you can
>>>>>> grab the most recent version of EMF, SDO, or XSD that way. Should
>>>>>> be current as of about 2pm today.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/emf/updates/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nick Boldt
>>>>>> codeslave(at)ca(dot)ibm(dot)com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> G. Doney wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Arun,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good idea. I?ve added it to both the EMF and XSD FAQs. Thanks for
>>>>>>> the suggestion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the response.
>>>>>>>> It might be worth adding to the FAQ to save others some cycles.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Arun
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:bkdfme$js9$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Arun,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is no eclipse Update Manager site available yet for EMF.
>>>>>>>>> I don't
>>>>>>>>> know about the other eclipse tools subprojects. You might try
>>>>>>>>> posting to
>>>>>>>>> the forums for the other tools that you are interested in to
>>>>>>>>> see if there
>>>>>>>>> are sites for them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes....a site that works with the eclipse Update Manager.
>>>>>>>>>> I currently have http://update.eclipse.org/updates/ set-up for
>>>>>>>>>> Eclipse
>>>>>>>>>> updates.
>>>>>>>>>> Although it does not seem to work with EMF or the other tools
>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't see them listed under th Eclipse SDK 2.1.1 folder.
>>>>>>>>>> Just like CVS I was wondering if there is another URL for the
>>>>>>>>>> Tools
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Project
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> plug-ins.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Arun.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "G. Doney" <doney@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:bkavqu$a7t$1@eclipse.org...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Arun,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Just to clarify...are you asking about a site that works with
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Eclipse
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Update Manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Arun Goyal wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I was wondering if there is a EMF update site....the default
>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>> seem to pick up new updates for EMF.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Arun
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
|
|
| |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Jan 15 11:36:07 GMT 2025
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04669 seconds
|