| org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contentTypes vs. org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes [message #331643] |
Mon, 15 September 2008 14:16  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: jarciuch.wp.pl
Does anybody know what is the difference between using:
org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes
and
org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contenTypes
to define content type?
It looks like there are 2 different extensions doing the same.
What is the best practice to contribute content? What extension should be
used?
Regards,
Jan
|
|
|
|
| Re: org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contentTypes vs. org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes [message #331646 is a reply to message #331645] |
Mon, 15 September 2008 14:37  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: jarciuch.wp.pl
That's what I suspected. :) Just couldn't find 'depricated' or any relevant
info in the extension point docs (hence my confusion).
Cheers,
Jan
"Ed Merks" <Ed.Merks@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:galqt5$k6n$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Jan,
>
> Comments below.
>
> Jan Arciuchiewicz wrote:
>> Does anybody know what is the difference between using:
>> org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes
>>
> This one is deprecated in 2.5
>> and
>> org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contenTypes
>> to define content type?
>>
> And this one isn't.
>> It looks like there are 2 different extensions doing the same.
>>
> That's exactly what they are.
>> What is the best practice to contribute content? What extension should be
>> used?
>>
> I'd use the one that isn't deprecated in 2.5. :-P
>> Regards,
>> Jan
>>
>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contentTypes vs. org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes [message #331652 is a reply to message #331650] |
Mon, 15 September 2008 18:03 |
 Ed Merks
Messages: 33183
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Dani,
Sorry. It's EMF that's at 2.5, which of course is totally irrelevant
when answering platform newsgroup questions. :-P
Daniel Megert wrote:
> Jan Arciuchiewicz wrote:
>> That's what I suspected. :) Just couldn't find 'depricated' or any
>> relevant info in the extension point docs (hence my confusion).
>>
> You don't see this because it got deprecated in 3.5 (not 2.5).
>
> Dani
>> Cheers,
>> Jan
>>
>> "Ed Merks" <Ed.Merks@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:galqt5$k6n$1@build.eclipse.org...
>>
>>> Jan,
>>>
>>> Comments below.
>>>
>>> Jan Arciuchiewicz wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does anybody know what is the difference between using:
>>>> org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes
>>>>
>>>>
>>> This one is deprecated in 2.5
>>>
>>>> and
>>>> org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contenTypes
>>>> to define content type?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> And this one isn't.
>>>
>>>> It looks like there are 2 different extensions doing the same.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That's exactly what they are.
>>>
>>>> What is the best practice to contribute content? What extension
>>>> should be used?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I'd use the one that isn't deprecated in 2.5. :-P
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03935 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
