Browsing a-la VisualAge [message #261407] |
Wed, 14 July 2004 07:27 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: mik.c-l-a-s-s-x.it
Is there a way to browse classes method-by-method as with VisualAge for java
?
Mik
--
|
|
|
Re: Browsing a-la VisualAge [message #261425 is a reply to message #261407] |
Wed, 14 July 2004 11:34 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: wassimm.ca.ibm.com
With a Java editor open, press the "Show Source of Selected Element Only"
toolbar menu button.
Wassim.
Michele Puccini wrote:
> Is there a way to browse classes method-by-method as with VisualAge for java
> ?
> Mik
> --
|
|
|
Re: Browsing a-la VisualAge [message #261441 is a reply to message #261425] |
Wed, 14 July 2004 12:59 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: mik.c-l-a-s-s-x.it
Found it, thanks!
With this trick we can only browse methods and fields. What about the class
definition ?
Mik
--
"Wassim Melhem" <wassimm@ca.ibm.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:cd35no$d6c$1@eclipse.org...
> With a Java editor open, press the "Show Source of Selected Element Only"
> toolbar menu button.
>
> Wassim.
>
> Michele Puccini wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to browse classes method-by-method as with VisualAge for
java
> > ?
>
> > Mik
> > --
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Browsing a-la VisualAge [message #261460 is a reply to message #261441] |
Wed, 14 July 2004 13:58 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: john.eclipsefaq.org
It will browse whatever you click on. If you use the Java Browsing
perspective, you can select a type in the Types view to see the
definition in the editor. Also, ctrl+clicking the selected method in the
outline view will revert focus back to the whole file (since there is no
longer a selected member to focus on).
--
Michele Puccini wrote:
> With this trick we can only browse methods and fields. What about the class
> definition ?
|
|
|
Re: Browsing a-la VisualAge [message #261502 is a reply to message #261407] |
Wed, 14 July 2004 15:29 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: eclipse.rizzoweb.com
Michele Puccini wrote:
> Is there a way to browse classes method-by-method as with VisualAge for java
As an long-time VAJ evangelist, I've found the Java Browsing perspective
to be the most familiar and efficient for working with Java code. I also
frequently turn on the "Show Source of Selected Element" option.
HTH,
Eric
|
|
|
Re: Browsing a-la VisualAge [message #261642 is a reply to message #261502] |
Thu, 15 July 2004 07:25 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: mik.c-l-a-s-s-x.it
I remember your posts in the VAJ newsgroups. Nice to meet you again here.
Yo've been of great help for the VAJ community and it's positive to see that
you're doing the same with the Eclipse one.
Even if I'm currently evaluating the migration to Eclipse, we're still
hardly working with VAJ for three main reasons:
- we can't stand without VCE.
- we have such a huge amount of visual classes, beans and swing-based stuff.
- the VAJ versioning system is simpler/quicker than CVS.
I know we'll be "forced" to migrate in close time, so I hope to make this
migration as painless as I can.
Cheers,
Mik
--
"Eric Rizzo" <eclipse@rizzoweb.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:cd3jee$8oh$2@eclipse.org...
> Michele Puccini wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to browse classes method-by-method as with VisualAge for
java
>
> As an long-time VAJ evangelist, I've found the Java Browsing perspective
> to be the most familiar and efficient for working with Java code. I also
> frequently turn on the "Show Source of Selected Element" option.
>
> HTH,
> Eric
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Browsing a-la VisualAge [message #261811 is a reply to message #261804] |
Thu, 15 July 2004 16:00 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: richkulp.NO.SPAM.us.ibm.com
It should understand them as events, assuming you use style 3. style 1
and 2 are problematic for the parser to understand. style 2 is partially
supported for displaying that you have events.
You can add event listeners through the VE, but the contents of the
event require coding.
I know it's not connections per-se. :-)
--
Thanks, Rich Kulp
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03571 seconds