|
Re: Will the bpel designer initial contribution be based on the Collaxa code? [message #721 is a reply to message #696] |
Wed, 20 July 2005 14:29 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: edwin.khodabakchian.oracle.com
Thanks Philippe (sorry for the delay).
The initial contribution is still an open question: we have an eclipse
implementation today (which is indeed based on the Collaxa code base) but
that contribution is built in DHTML/Ajax. At this point, the thinking is
to carry forward the knowledge and some of the design elements but
re-implement a more native eclipse solution. By native, we mean
implemented in Java and taking advantage of EMF and other graphical
frameworks available in Eclipse. (Note: if you want to look at what the
latest designer implementation looks like, you can download the eclipse
plugin from the http://otn.oracle.com/bpel site, given that is implemented
in DHTML, all the code is there!)
From a timeline perspective, the eclipse process has a 1-month review
process before making a decision. The goal during that month is to build a
community around the project and this is what we are actively doing.
Best,
Edwin
|
|
|
Re: Will the bpel designer initial contribution be based on the Collaxa code? [message #737 is a reply to message #721] |
Mon, 25 July 2005 18:10 |
Philippe Ombredanne Messages: 386 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Edwin,
Thanks for your reply.
Just my 2 cents: if you have a working contribution as a starting point,
even if you may want to re-implement it as a native Java/SWT application, I
would be a strong advocate of starting with that.
Projects that start with a clean slate have a hard time to create a
community following!
And a plug-in with a DHTML UI would be quite interesting in itself too.
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwin.khodabakchian@oracle.com> wrote in message
news:acd293b2e21716f9c39f69e376fb7939$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Thanks Philippe (sorry for the delay).
>
> The initial contribution is still an open question: we have an eclipse
> implementation today (which is indeed based on the Collaxa code base) but
> that contribution is built in DHTML/Ajax. At this point, the thinking is
> to carry forward the knowledge and some of the design elements but
> re-implement a more native eclipse solution. By native, we mean
> implemented in Java and taking advantage of EMF and other graphical
> frameworks available in Eclipse. (Note: if you want to look at what the
> latest designer implementation looks like, you can download the eclipse
> plugin from the http://otn.oracle.com/bpel site, given that is implemented
> in DHTML, all the code is there!)
>
> From a timeline perspective, the eclipse process has a 1-month review
> process before making a decision. The goal during that month is to build a
> community around the project and this is what we are actively doing.
>
> Best,
> Edwin
>
>
|
|
|
|
Re: Will the bpel designer initial contribution be based on the Collaxa code? [message #2081 is a reply to message #721] |
Wed, 04 January 2006 21:57 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: vgv8.yahoo.com.br
Hi, Edwin,
there is no download in your link whatsoever.
Could it b possible to update the link for DHTML/AJAX Designer
implementation download?
> frameworks available in Eclipse. (Note: if you want to look at what the
> latest designer implementation looks like, you can download the eclipse
> plugin from the http://otn.oracle.com/bpel site, given that is implemented
> in DHTML, all the code is there!)
Another question is what is the rationale for such strange decision to move
from AJAX/DHTML Designer to EMF? Might be I do not understand something but
for me is more natural to have web-based solutions vs. desktop ones.
Guennadi Vanine
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Will the bpel designer initial contribution be based on the Collaxa code? [message #2334 is a reply to message #2304] |
Mon, 16 January 2006 23:03 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: vgv8.yahoo.com.br
Hi, James,
Well, I checked it before writing my post and you?
Guennadi Vanine
"James Moody" <James_Moody@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:dpu1vq$pem$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> rich wrote:
>> According to the 11/15 to 11/27 F2F Eclipse BPEL-Designer executive
>> summary minutes, there is a "...desire to use IBM's editor, model, and
>> validator codebase...".
>> Is there a time frame when the IBM code base will be made available?
>>
>
> It's available now.
>
> Check my posting from 11/29/2005 entitled "Initial code release" in this
> newsgroup.
>
> james
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03556 seconds