Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Language IDEs » Java Development Tools (JDT) » Is jdtCompilerAdaptor still needed?
Is jdtCompilerAdaptor still needed? [message #211340] Mon, 01 August 2005 19:31 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: nospam.nospam.org

For "development mode" ant builds we used to set the ANT_OPTS to
use jdtCompilerAdapter (and set corresponding classpath) in order
to guarantee that any classes compiled in Eclipse and javac (form Ant)
would be serialization-compatible.

Is this trick still needed in 3.1? The needed JARs for it are now hidden
inside the plugins JARs, but that is not a big issue.

Thanks

Richard
Re: Is jdtCompilerAdaptor still needed? [message #211348 is a reply to message #211340] Mon, 01 August 2005 20:45 Go to previous message
Darin Swanson is currently offline Darin SwansonFriend
Messages: 2386
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
There is no change in 3.1...to ensure compilation with the JDT Compiler you
need to set the jdtCompilerAdapter and add the correct JARs to the classpath

Darins

"Richard Nemec" <nospam@nospam.org> wrote in message
news:dcltb4$kgv$1@news.eclipse.org...
> For "development mode" ant builds we used to set the ANT_OPTS to
> use jdtCompilerAdapter (and set corresponding classpath) in order
> to guarantee that any classes compiled in Eclipse and javac (form Ant)
> would be serialization-compatible.
>
> Is this trick still needed in 3.1? The needed JARs for it are now hidden
> inside the plugins JARs, but that is not a big issue.
>
> Thanks
>
> Richard
Previous Topic:excluding directories
Next Topic:Add interfaces to a type automatically
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Oct 06 09:18:57 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03108 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top