|
|
|
|
| Re: create containment association at a superclass level [message #170520 is a reply to message #170488] |
Tue, 29 January 2008 15:01   |
 Boris Blajer
Messages: 217
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Julien,
A "phantom" reference-based link is a link mapping where these two
fields are not blank and the target feature is a containment feature.
Best regards,
Boris
Julien DeAntoni wrote:
> Thank you Boris,
>
> just to be sure; A "phantom" reference-based link is just a link mapping
> where the only non-blank fields are "target Features" and "diagram
> Link" ?
>
> Regards,
> Julien
>
>
> Boris Blajer wrote:
>> Hi Julien,
>>
>> You should declare a separate node in the mapping model for each of
>> the non-abstract subclasses and a single "phantom" reference-based
>> link for the containment reference. I believe it should work; if it
>> doesn't, you should probably file a bug report.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Boris
>>
>> Julien DeAntoni wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> sorry for this question but I'm really out of idea :-/
>>>
>>> I have a class that has an containment relation with an abstract
>>> superclass. Two classes inherit from the abstract class.
>>> I'd like to represent the containment on my diagram but the regular
>>> way to do for containment relation (see here :
>>> http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.modeling.gmf/m sg08564.html)
>>> does not work :-(
>>>
>>> Please, how can I do ?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> julien
|
|
|
| Re: create containment association at a superclass level [message #170536 is a reply to message #170520] |
Tue, 29 January 2008 15:35 |
Julien Deantoni
Messages: 45
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
OK,
so finally there is a bug...
thanks !
Best regards
Julien
Boris Blajer wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> A "phantom" reference-based link is a link mapping where these two
> fields are not blank and the target feature is a containment feature.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Boris
>
> Julien DeAntoni wrote:
>> Thank you Boris,
>>
>> just to be sure; A "phantom" reference-based link is just a link
>> mapping where the only non-blank fields are "target Features" and
>> "diagram Link" ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Julien
>>
>>
>> Boris Blajer wrote:
>>> Hi Julien,
>>>
>>> You should declare a separate node in the mapping model for each of
>>> the non-abstract subclasses and a single "phantom" reference-based
>>> link for the containment reference. I believe it should work; if it
>>> doesn't, you should probably file a bug report.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Boris
>>>
>>> Julien DeAntoni wrote:
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> sorry for this question but I'm really out of idea :-/
>>>>
>>>> I have a class that has an containment relation with an abstract
>>>> superclass. Two classes inherit from the abstract class.
>>>> I'd like to represent the containment on my diagram but the regular
>>>> way to do for containment relation (see here :
>>>> http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.modeling.gmf/m sg08564.html)
>>>> does not work :-(
>>>>
>>>> Please, how can I do ?
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>>
>>>> julien
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03394 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
