|
| Re: Cheetah features and schedule [message #163315 is a reply to message #163080] |
Wed, 09 June 2004 01:23   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: Lynn.Orrell.wiltel.com
I too would love to see the release schedule (if any) for Cheetah...
"Steven Buroff" <sburoff@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:ca29r2$dta$1@eclipse.org...
> Is there any schedule for Cheetah? In particular, will support for
> enumerations,
> autoboxing, and static imports be coming soon? In case anyone cares,
> enumerations
> are definitely my highest priority. Thanks.
>
> Steve Buroff
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Cheetah features and schedule [message #163420 is a reply to message #163381] |
Wed, 09 June 2004 14:13 |
 Steven Buroff
Messages: 119
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Apparently Cheetah is not considered a very high priority. This is rather
disappointing. Not even having a schedule means that we can't even plan
ahead. You have a very detailed schedule for 3.0, why not for Cheetah?
Many people have requested one. My guess is that a schedule would be a
committment and I guess you don't want to commit to supporting 1.5.
I think I'll give NetBeans a try.
Steve
"Philippe Mulet" <philippe_mulet@fr.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:ca6rfj$urv$1@eclipse.org...
> We don't have a formalized schedule for Cheetah deliveries.
> A fair answer is *after* we ship 3.0 <g>. We will still try to post a
better
> patch before end of June,
> but it will not support enumerations by then. Currently, the area of
> improvements are around leveraging some of the generics in the JavaModel
> (which is the corner stone for all the IDE Java tools... outliner, errors
in
> editor, etc...).
>
> "Lynn Orrell" <Lynn.Orrell@wiltel.com> wrote in message
> news:ca5o95$qtg$1@eclipse.org...
> > I too would love to see the release schedule (if any) for Cheetah...
> >
> >
> > "Steven Buroff" <sburoff@optonline.net> wrote in message
> > news:ca29r2$dta$1@eclipse.org...
> > > Is there any schedule for Cheetah? In particular, will support for
> > > enumerations,
> > > autoboxing, and static imports be coming soon? In case anyone cares,
> > > enumerations
> > > are definitely my highest priority. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Steve Buroff
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Cheetah features and schedule [message #163427 is a reply to message #163420] |
Wed, 09 June 2004 14:16 |
Philippe Mulet
Messages: 229
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Then why do you think we bother working on this preview ?
Yes we want to deliver 1.5, but we want to deliver one thing at a time.
Don't ask for a schedule for Eclipse R3.1 until R3.0 is done.
"Steven Buroff" <sburoff@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:ca75eg$c3f$1@eclipse.org...
> Apparently Cheetah is not considered a very high priority. This is rather
> disappointing. Not even having a schedule means that we can't even plan
> ahead. You have a very detailed schedule for 3.0, why not for Cheetah?
> Many people have requested one. My guess is that a schedule would be a
> committment and I guess you don't want to commit to supporting 1.5.
> I think I'll give NetBeans a try.
>
> Steve
>
>
> "Philippe Mulet" <philippe_mulet@fr.ibm.com> wrote in message
> news:ca6rfj$urv$1@eclipse.org...
> > We don't have a formalized schedule for Cheetah deliveries.
> > A fair answer is *after* we ship 3.0 <g>. We will still try to post a
> better
> > patch before end of June,
> > but it will not support enumerations by then. Currently, the area of
> > improvements are around leveraging some of the generics in the JavaModel
> > (which is the corner stone for all the IDE Java tools... outliner,
errors
> in
> > editor, etc...).
> >
> > "Lynn Orrell" <Lynn.Orrell@wiltel.com> wrote in message
> > news:ca5o95$qtg$1@eclipse.org...
> > > I too would love to see the release schedule (if any) for Cheetah...
> > >
> > >
> > > "Steven Buroff" <sburoff@optonline.net> wrote in message
> > > news:ca29r2$dta$1@eclipse.org...
> > > > Is there any schedule for Cheetah? In particular, will support for
> > > > enumerations,
> > > > autoboxing, and static imports be coming soon? In case anyone cares,
> > > > enumerations
> > > > are definitely my highest priority. Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Steve Buroff
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04396 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
