| Tally the votes on project name [message #14397] |
Wed, 21 January 2004 03:45  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: richardluong.msn.com
Project Name:
(votes) voters...
SolarEclipse:
(2) Igor M.*, Vasanth D.
Web Development Tools for Eclipse:
(3+1**) Chris L., Alex F., myself, Sjoerd L.
webdt:
(2) Matthew B., Adam F.
* - Igor also suggested TWINS as a potential name in the "Propose to
move to ObjectWeb" thread
** - Sjoerd had Web Development Tooling as one of his many name
suggestions in the ObjectWeb thread.
Not by a much of a lead, but it appears that Web Development Tools for
Eclipse is the "winner". Unless people want to continue to debate over
the name, can we close this issue?
In my eyes, I see Igor's, Chris' and Alex's votes having the extra
weight seeing as to how they all have pre-existing project codebases
that they *can* donate right away. Can we close this, and move on
before the everyone's enthusiasm dies out? Already the posts seem less
active.
Richard.
|
|
|
| Re: Tally the votes on project name [message #14426 is a reply to message #14397] |
Wed, 21 January 2004 08:44  |
 Alex Fitzpatrick
Messages: 124
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Richard Luong wrote:
> Project Name:
> (votes) voters...
>
> SolarEclipse:
> (2) Igor M.*, Vasanth D.
> Web Development Tools for Eclipse:
> (3+1**) Chris L., Alex F., myself, Sjoerd L.
> webdt:
> (2) Matthew B., Adam F.
>
> * - Igor also suggested TWINS as a potential name in the "Propose to
> move to ObjectWeb" thread
> ** - Sjoerd had Web Development Tooling as one of his many name
> suggestions in the ObjectWeb thread.
>
> Not by a much of a lead, but it appears that Web Development Tools for
> Eclipse is the "winner". Unless people want to continue to debate over
> the name, can we close this issue?
>
> In my eyes, I see Igor's, Chris' and Alex's votes having the extra
> weight seeing as to how they all have pre-existing project codebases
> that they *can* donate right away. Can we close this, and move on
> before the everyone's enthusiasm dies out? Already the posts seem less
> active.
Seconded and I call question.
--
Alex
|
|
|
| Re: Tally the votes on project name [message #14455 is a reply to message #14397] |
Wed, 21 January 2004 10:44 |
Christopher Lenz
Messages: 48
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Richard Luong wrote:
> Project Name:
> (votes) voters...
>
> SolarEclipse:
> (2) Igor M.*, Vasanth D.
> Web Development Tools for Eclipse:
> (3+1**) Chris L., Alex F., myself, Sjoerd L.
> webdt:
> (2) Matthew B., Adam F.
>
> * - Igor also suggested TWINS as a potential name in the "Propose to
> move to ObjectWeb" thread
> ** - Sjoerd had Web Development Tooling as one of his many name
> suggestions in the ObjectWeb thread.
>
> Not by a much of a lead, but it appears that Web Development Tools for
> Eclipse is the "winner". Unless people want to continue to debate over
> the name, can we close this issue?
Yes please :-)
Igor, I understand that you're not really in love with "Web Development
Tools for Eclipse" (WDTE). Would you still be okay contributing to the
project if we choose this path and not go with SolarEclipse?
There is also room for compromise IMO: SolarEclipse could live on as a
project providing JSP/J2EE tooling built on top of WDTE, for example. What
do you think?
Cheers,
Chris
--
/=/ cmlenz at gmx.de
|
|
|
| Re: Tally the votes on project name [message #14483 is a reply to message #14455] |
Wed, 21 January 2004 14:33 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: igor.malinin.aqris.com
Christopher Lenz wrote:
> Richard Luong wrote:
>
>> Not by a much of a lead, but it appears that Web Development Tools for
>> Eclipse is the "winner". Unless people want to continue to debate
>> over the name, can we close this issue?
>
> Yes please :-)
>
> Igor, I understand that you're not really in love with "Web Development
> Tools for Eclipse" (WDTE). Would you still be okay contributing to the
> project if we choose this path and not go with SolarEclipse?
WDTE - sounds very like a russian acronym for an accident on a road :)
I am ok contributing to it if we choose this path. Just don't want to
repeat some things again... and waste a space with one more dead project
(try to search "eclipse" on SourceForge and you will see tons of dead
projects and many of them related to web&xml)...
> There is also room for compromise IMO: SolarEclipse could live on as a
> project providing JSP/J2EE tooling built on top of WDTE, for example.
> What do you think?
Actually only time will show... But what I am like to focus today is XML
tools.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Tally the votes on project name [message #14989 is a reply to message #14426] |
Thu, 22 January 2004 16:28 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: mbrozowski.nc.rr.com
I'm in agreement. WDTE it is... Can we start coding now?
Matt Brozowski
"Alex.Fitzpatrick" <alex.fitzpatrick@cognos.com> wrote in message
news:bule2k$1kc$1@eclipse.org...
> Richard Luong wrote:
> > Project Name:
> > (votes) voters...
> >
> > SolarEclipse:
> > (2) Igor M.*, Vasanth D.
> > Web Development Tools for Eclipse:
> > (3+1**) Chris L., Alex F., myself, Sjoerd L.
> > webdt:
> > (2) Matthew B., Adam F.
> >
> > * - Igor also suggested TWINS as a potential name in the "Propose to
> > move to ObjectWeb" thread
> > ** - Sjoerd had Web Development Tooling as one of his many name
> > suggestions in the ObjectWeb thread.
> >
> > Not by a much of a lead, but it appears that Web Development Tools for
> > Eclipse is the "winner". Unless people want to continue to debate over
> > the name, can we close this issue?
> >
> > In my eyes, I see Igor's, Chris' and Alex's votes having the extra
> > weight seeing as to how they all have pre-existing project codebases
> > that they *can* donate right away. Can we close this, and move on
> > before the everyone's enthusiasm dies out? Already the posts seem less
> > active.
>
> Seconded and I call question.
>
> --
> Alex
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03936 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
